Would you prefer one belt per weight division?

This content is protected

I sure do
it aint ever happening though

 

Multiple belts in each division would not be bad if there was a tournament every 4 years like a world cup. The four major belt holders have a tournament. the way it is now is too convoluted!

 

its not the belts number. its the orgs.

 

Count me in....

 

Totally, that way people like Golovkin and Kovalev would stop pretending to be champions and would have no choice but to accept the demands of Canelo and Stevenson thus enabling the fights to happen quicker.

 

It's not the orgs, it's the promoters.

 

Who would want more than one belt per division?
The most disgusting thing is that IBO is gaining traction. IBO, WBO, IBF, WBA, Super WBA, WBC - PATHETIC.

 

Exactly. Anything less, with competing promoters making fights means we're going to continue with multiple champions who have little obligation to fight the best. AIBA has the start of a model to run boxing completely, but there are so many obstacles to its growth, especially in the US, and, well we know how they ran the Olympics and that they were so unaccountable for bad decisions and charges of corruption, so it's hard to be too excited about them running pro boxing.

 

You can´t get paid x amount of millions if you don´t put asses in seats. Why can´t fans understand this?

 

Certainly. Ducking would be almost impossible, because in situations like Spinks/Tucker, Bowe/Lewis and Canelo/Golovkin, dropping the belt means dropping the championship and be totally ridiculed after.

We would get the best fights if they want to be the champion or actually defend it. No chicken moves, no diva antics, no a-side and b-side meth bull.

Boxing will never be perfect but it would be so much better.

 

WWE is now following boxing's act. There are now two championships, Raw and Smackdown.

 

Agree with every word.

 

Fans don't have to understand this.

We aren't financial fans nor accounting fans. We're boxing fans.