Would you rather have seen Wilder or Fury take Wlad's throne?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MVC!, Nov 29, 2015.


Page 2 of 2
  1. YesMySon

    YesMySon Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,997
    13
    Aug 12, 2015
    I wouldn't be that disrespectful toward sour milk.
     
    YesMySon, Nov 29, 2015
    YesMySon, Nov 29, 2015
    #16
  2. TSoprano

    TSoprano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,965
    895
    Sep 26, 2014
    Wilder is not a top 10 heavyweight. He would not have beaten Klitschko.
     
    TSoprano, Nov 29, 2015
    TSoprano, Nov 29, 2015
    #17
  3. Mr Icaman

    Mr Icaman 32-0 WBC Champ, Ring + Lineal HW Champ Full Member

    4,451
    3,429
    Aug 31, 2015
    Wilder has proven nothing, Fury has dominated the Lineal Champ.

    Compare who Wilder beat to win a belt.

    Both could have gone after Wlad only one did. The other prefers fighting tomato cans.
     
    Mr Icaman, Nov 29, 2015
    Mr Icaman, Nov 29, 2015
    #18
  4. Box-Fan

    Box-Fan Active Member Full Member

    771
    27
    May 31, 2012
    He might have beaten the Wlad last night considering Wlad barley threw 10 punches all fight long.
     
    Box-Fan, Nov 29, 2015
    Box-Fan, Nov 29, 2015
    #19
  5. GloriaAblaze

    GloriaAblaze Active Member Full Member

    936
    0
    Nov 28, 2015
    Wilder couldn't execute Fury's gameplan.
     
    GloriaAblaze, Nov 29, 2015
    GloriaAblaze, Nov 29, 2015
    #20
  6. The Smoking Man

    The Smoking Man Boxing Addict banned

    4,736
    4
    Jul 24, 2015
    Wlad had a low output becuase of fury's tactics and skill. Wilder couldn't fight like Fury. Also wlad has thr mental edge over wilder after destroying him in sparring

    Where as fury had already beaten wlad in the suana
     
    The Smoking Man, Nov 29, 2015
    The Smoking Man, Nov 29, 2015
    #21
Page 2 of 2