I thought I'd add to the 1000 threads already made about this, but horrible, horrible decision. Im British by the way, and Froch won by atleast 9 rounds....... sike. He lost the fight plain and simple, couldn't land any of note, actually anything at all. He was hitting fresh air the entire fight and was considerably gassed towards the end. Sad for Direll, got robbed .. people saying he didnt do enough to win the title and all this bull****, he outboxed and landed the cleaner punches all night, **** else is the guy supposed to do? Go toe-to-toe Hagler-Hearns style and lose? His gameplan was perfect and he won the fight. I guess the judges were swayed by the crowds hoorays at fresh air punches, musta been watching the fight on the same TV that showed ODLH-Mayweather. Hitting gloves and fresh air wins you rounds, laughable. Best punch all night was Dirells left hand to the stomach .. Oh, and the UK commentators were utter shite too. Biased bunch of ****ers. Just spouting absolute rubbish, its embarrasing man. SnR
He didn't touch dirrell's face 20 times the whole fight. He got his head snapped back repeatedly by dirrell and still gets a BS decision. This is bad news for kessler coming to oakland to fight ward. He's gonna have to finish him now because his chances of gettin a decision just got slimmer with dirrell getting robbed. You heard it here first. Kessler must score a KO to beat andre ward.
While Froch was coming forward and being the aggressor by throwing and missing shots, Dirrell was running. This went on for most of the rounds. In many rounds Froch may not have scored the cleaner blows but won on pure aggression and initiation similar to Calzaghe v Hopkins.
How can you possibly give rounds to a guy that isn't there to do his job? His job is to ****ing fight and he did anything but that. Now i'm American but I can't see anyone criticise the Klits and say what Direll did last night was ok, he was ficking embarrassing. Now someone can say I don't know boxing, as I probably don't as much as many on here, but I ****ing know a little ***** when i see one and that was Dirrell last night
But Calzaghe threw more and landed more punches(slaps). Froch landed less despite being the aggressor each and every round. Come up with some better **** or remove the dick from your "bottom".
Hopkins was spoiling and clinching everytime Calzaghe initiated. He missed most of his slap combinations, Hopkins landed the cleaner single shots knocking him down but lost the decision. Froch stayed with Dirrell throughout the fight, many rounds just jabbing wars being decided by Froch throwing himself forward and swinging wildly (landing inaccurately or missing usually but showing aggression and initaition), while Dirrell ran, clinched, turned his back, ducked down or fell to the floor. Froch by close decision is no robbery. A draw or win either way would be adequate. Probably if Witter was American and Judah was British you'd all be complaining that Witter was robbed. With your choice of reactionary insult I can see how Dirrell's "camp" style of "fighting" may have appealed to you last night.
mate you talk ****! the crowd was more or less silent for the whole fight and to add to that rawling + thaxton(commentators) actually had dirrell winning . So many plastic brits have started to show up all of a sudden..us passport by chance?!
Actually pal, you're talking ****. Everytime Froch threw a punch or got remotely close, the crowd acted like it was Glastonbury - FACT, you silly ****. Yes, they had him winning by a point, but listening to their commentry, they were trying ANYTHING to give Froch the rounds, and for large parts had to stay ABSOLUELY ****ING SILENT because Froch couldnt land a shot. I used to box you ****ing bell-end, so don't give me this plastic Brit ****. I've represented my country and the ****ing UK in amateur championships, so quit swarking ya gums like you actually know ****. YOU DONT. Now **** off .... adios. SnR
