Wow he was robbed..

You can still have a close fight in which a guy gets robbed though. If a guy clearly wins 7 rounds where no matter what your criteria is you can not score the round for the other guy and the other guy clearly wins 5 rounds where no matter what your criteria is you can not score the fight for the other guy, then you have a close fight in which a robbery is possible. If you scored any of the 7 rounds for the other guy then you are robbing the guy that clearly won that round and therefore robbing him of the fight.

 

Sound off the 7 clear rounds so we can debunk that **** instantly.

 

I actually had Floyd winning 114-113. But what is lost in all of this...Is Floyd not running nor ducking to fight someone else....There was an immediadte rematch!!! And he proved that his win was NO FLUKE!!!!!

There have been so many DAMN GOOD, close fights, that "we" (as fight fans) were denied the opportunity to see proof of WHO IS THE BETTER FIGHTER via a REMATCH...Would have love to have seen:

Whitaker vs Chavez 2
Sturm Vd DLH 2
DLH vs Trinidad 2
Cotto vs Clottey 2

And many more!!!!

 

I agree with you here but that logic does'nt apply to the first Floyd/Castillo fight which was truly a fight that could have gone either way depending on what you like in a fight.

 

Mayweather - Castillo
(1)10-9
(2)10-9
(3)10-9
(4)10-9
(5)10-9
(6)9-10
(7)9-10
(8)9-9
(9)9-10
(10)9-9
(11)9-10
(12)10-9

114-112 Mayweather is my scorecard

 

First, DLH didn't win the first 8 rds., not all... he definitely ran the last 3-4 rds.... u don't win a big fight like that by running the last 3-4 rds. All TITO needed was 3 of the first 8 rds. to win , which I think he did more than clearly since it was a close fight.... I saw it like that, and 3 judges saw it like that , with Glen Hamada being the only 1 seeing as a tie.... I am Puertorican as a matter of fact, are you a moron?... just for the rec.!

 

You fall two short of a win with your math--making Castillo the winner

then arguably Castillo won the other seven

 

He was merely pointing out that Floyd on most cards won the first 5 rounds.

To act like Castillo swept the last 7 is laughable.

 

Judah fought a good fight against Mayweather the first 4 rounds, if he could've adjusted he may've beaten Mayweather, I had it 116-112 Mayweather.

 

I had it 113-113..Though I felt Castillo was the better man on the night..doing more damage and controlling the ring better.

I dont think it was an absolutely terrible decision..but the scores didnt sit well with me..They were fishy they were unanimously clear for Floyd.
But I think people maker a bigger deal out of this because they dont like Floyd...I aint talking about Floyd hate, just saying to a lot he isnt their favorite. And this can effect how pissed off people get about the end result.

 

Some people just want him to have that 1 on his record for whatever reason.

It would only make him greater IMO.

Coming back from adversity and never losing again.

 

I actually thought that this bout scared Mayweather a bit.

He made sure after this one he was going for the best risk/reward fights out there..and fight guys who couldnt challenge him in between those bouts.

Cant hate on him for this..thats just the game these days. But I dont consider him greater because of it.

 

yea i think if judah would have kept doing wat he was doing in the early rounds he could have beat floyd maybe he even have knocked him out.. and eveyone knoes that mayweather did not slip he got knocked down..