Wow. People still think Froch beat Andre Dirrell? I thought it was Consensus

Please not this one again... Dirrell f*%ked it up himself! Get over it! atsch

 

Jumping to the floor on his knees and constant whining to the ref played it's part. Think you meant 'robbed' also

 

Based on few highlights? Please. I already told you that Direll landed more punches because he had some good rounds where he dominated and even hurt Froch but because we score the fights on round by round basis then we have to score each round seperately. Post the whole fight.

Notice how the commentator says during the 4th round "Oh Direll nice punch, he finally started going after Froch a little bit" Finally because he wasnt doing **** obviously prior to that.

 

Why do you think your opinion is consensus?

It was close, I had it for Dirrell as well, but robbery? No freaking way, close fight, and the only one Dirrell can blame is himself. Do you seriously think he thought he's ahead with that passive ****, in Froch's hometown?

Watch Martinez vs. Cintron for consensus robbery.

 

They said that because they knew Dirrell was the better fighter in there and was probably wondering why he doesn't take Croch's head off!!!!

 

Yea this was a Robbery.. Dirrell clearly won but he could have did more...

 

No he fell to the floor I have seen it loads of times. Don't make **** up.

 

I watched that fight many times and was debating in meaningful discussions on this subject. I am not goign to rewatch it now because I dont feel the need to. I had it 6-6 in rounds but soe of these rounds were so close I accept narrow victory for either man. You are the only one who comes up with this consensus bull****.

 

It wasn't a robbery, it was a close fight with very little action due to Dirrell being stupidly negative for 10 of the 12 rounds and Froch being totally clueless. I had Dirrell winning by a couple of points, but it was hardly a Funeka-Guzman type decision like you get in the US.