wow...robbery!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Ambition_Def, Feb 9, 2008.


Page 8 of 9
  1. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    Sending spit flying from the ring, cutting Williams over both eyes and avoiding his counters? Is that what you mean by "effective"? :think
     
    BewareofDawg, Feb 10, 2008
    BewareofDawg, Feb 10, 2008
    #106
  2. digiram

    digiram Active Member Full Member

    925
    0
    May 22, 2005
    Close fight that could've gone either way. I had it a draw, but Quintana win is fair. Far from a robbery by any means.
     
    digiram, Feb 10, 2008
    digiram, Feb 10, 2008
    #107
  3. ROC

    ROC Active Member Full Member

    607
    0
    Apr 12, 2007

    I was rooting for Williams but Quintana clearly won that fight.
    You must be a relative of Harold Lederman?!!:huh :rasta
     
    ROC, Feb 10, 2008
    ROC, Feb 10, 2008
    #108
  4. Larson

    Larson Paenkhay Full Member

    2,747
    0
    Dec 7, 2007
    :yep
     
    Larson, Feb 10, 2008
    Larson, Feb 10, 2008
    #109
  5. ROC

    ROC Active Member Full Member

    607
    0
    Apr 12, 2007

    You guys have a pointless agruement and should get off this Thread,the fight was a clear victory for Quintana, even Williams admitted to it,he was off it was a bad night and he took Quintana lightly. But don't worry it is only one lost and your boy Williams will be back!:patsch
     
    ROC, Feb 10, 2008
    ROC, Feb 10, 2008
    #110
  6. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    lmao...potshot?,,,he absolutely drilled him with about 100 flush punches, busted him up and PW had no complaints...I had it a draw but the six rds I had fro quintana were easy I could have seen him winning 3 of the other six...it was FAR from a robbery
     
    pauliemayweathe, Feb 10, 2008
    pauliemayweathe, Feb 10, 2008
    #111
  7. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    Look you sniveling little weasel. It is common practice to give the champion the benefit of the doubt during close rounds.

    Quintana easily won the first 4. After that he slowed down greatly, and was getting hit with clean punches. Williams pressed while Quintana SURVIVED, potshotting and grabbing on. Round 5 was clearly Williams. Round 6 as well as round 7. Round 8 I gave to Quintana because in a series of close contested rounds you have to give something to both men, so stagger the rounds.

    Round 11 is disputeable, but round 12 is not. Williams clearly won round 12.

    It should have been a draw or at best Quintana winning by a point. That 116-112 card was bull**** and anyone who rewatches that fight will see this clearly. You don't let the first few rounds sway your opinion over the course of 12. Which is what most of you clearly did.

    Class over. Go home. :hi:

    PS: Just because Williams lost to Quintana doesn't mean Margarito would. Only a buffoon would make that sort of comparison. Styles make fights.
     
    Ambition_Def, Feb 10, 2008
    Ambition_Def, Feb 10, 2008
    #112
  8. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    You don't understand what potshot means do you?

    Also you saw it a draw. So how can you not see 116-112 being anything but bull****? 116-112 means that you never gave the champion the benefit of a close round. Not one.

    I saw 4 easy rounds for Quintana. 4. And those were rounds 1-4. After that he slowed down, was easier to hit and his face was marked to prove it at the end. He also did alot of holding on and wrestling to try and take away Williams' offense later on in the fight. I call that surviving. I don't know what you call it.
     
    Ambition_Def, Feb 10, 2008
    Ambition_Def, Feb 10, 2008
    #113
  9. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    I thought it was a clear, but close win for Quintana. He was landing the cleaner punches. His punches looked to have more pop then Williams as well.
     
    Lance_Uppercut, Feb 10, 2008
    Lance_Uppercut, Feb 10, 2008
    #114
  10. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,769
    8,298
    Feb 11, 2005
    Even if you think Williams won, this ain't a robbery, because a lot of the rounds were close, and in that instance, the cleaner shots will usually catch the judges eye. Quintana landed those cleaner, more effective shots in the majority of the rounds; hence the reason why he got the not.

    I had it 115-112 Quintana
     
    Drew101, Feb 10, 2008
    Drew101, Feb 10, 2008
    #115
  11. rodney

    rodney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,332
    634
    Jun 16, 2006
    Sorry.
    This quote wasnt intended to deminish your comments.
    It was intended to suport them.
     
    rodney, Feb 10, 2008
    rodney, Feb 10, 2008
    #116
  12. bestdefense117

    bestdefense117 Young Gun Full Member

    532
    0
    Feb 1, 2008
    No Quintana beat Williams using the Sweet Science to nulify the reach advantage and land counters. I had Carlos up 9-3
     
    bestdefense117, Feb 10, 2008
    bestdefense117, Feb 10, 2008
    #117
  13. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    What did your scorecard look like?
     
    Ambition_Def, Feb 10, 2008
    Ambition_Def, Feb 10, 2008
    #118
  14. jecxbox

    jecxbox St. Brett Full Member

    7,608
    3
    Aug 5, 2007
    Quintana dominated that fight. Period.

    The rounds that Williams got, none were convincing rounds NONE OF THEM. I tried to give Williams some rounds but it wasn't many, even the ones I did give him were like toss up 50/50 rounds. PW was not punching with any kind of authority, he was slapping and he couldn't do anything. It would have absolutely been BAFFLING if Quintana would have lost that fight despite landing nearly 50% of ALL punches. I'm sorry but PW was SCHOOLED.
     
    jecxbox, Feb 10, 2008
    jecxbox, Feb 10, 2008
    #119
  15. Larson

    Larson Paenkhay Full Member

    2,747
    0
    Dec 7, 2007
    Yes, that's called bull****.
     
    Larson, Feb 10, 2008
    Larson, Feb 10, 2008
    #120
Page 8 of 9