scrubs? lmfao, who are you a fan boy of floyd? are you willing to admit guerreor at 147, and ortiz are scrubs? because geale's win over Sturm is better than anyhting they have done. Murray arguably beat Martinez, it's hilarious when people call former world champs "scrubs". He's beat the best of 160, besides the one guy that's terrified to fight him cotto, and Martinez who ducked him.
I said relative scrubs, and relative to Froch they are scrubs. I would pick Froch to KO every single name on Golovkin's resume. This thread has nothing at all to do with Mayweather so I don't know why in the **** you're bringing him up, or Guerrero and Ortiz for that matter. God damn this forum is full of morons. :verysad
because it's mostly mayweather fans that hate on him because ggg fans think he'll kill mayweahter. the fact that you're not denying it, and going with petty insults proves that it's true and that you're ashamed of it. I'm a floyd fan, and i think he beats GGG at 154. I wouldn't pick Froch to KO every single name on GGG's resume. Who has Froch stopped that isn't glass jawed recently? Groves=glass, Bute=glass, the only way I see Froch stopping Murray or Monroe is becuase of his size, but I highly doubt he stops Murray.
Keep trying to deflect. The fact remains that Golovkin hasn't beaten anyone who is anywhere near the caliber of Carl Froch. Froch is naturally bigger and FAR more proven against bigger and far better opposition. I don't really see how this is even up for debate.
deflect what? Jesus christ you're dumb . You're the one trying to deflect the fact that you called world champs "scrubs". You're right Golovkin hasn't beat anyone close to Froch. I never debated that. But if you have an eye for boxing which I highly doubt you do, you'd realize that Froch's style is terrible against GGG, and GGG is FAR more skilled. I'm guessing you haven't seen many Froch fights. If you're willing to put your money or account where your mouth is, I'll perm ban bet you, or bet you 100-500 bucks cash, whatever you want, we can get a mod to mediate and hold the cash. According to you Froch will be the favorite, so I'll give you even odds.
Do you see the holes in your argument.your a floyd fan,fair enough he's arguably the most skill full fighter of the last 20 odd years.you believe he could beat ggg,I don't think you could dismiss it that he could either,but on the same token,do u think in 100000000 years floyd would ever put it on the line ?? No offence do you ? Just saying
Why should he? He's nearly 40 you fking moron. Is GGG going to come down to 152, and not make excuses? GGG has done nothing to deserve a Floyd fight either. If the guys that are terrified of him liek Froch and COtto step up and he beats both he might have on flyods radar to take the rsik. Right now, GGG ahs beat solid opposition, but for the risk he won't fight him unless he's beat very elite opposition.
Again, I said relative scrubs. Perhaps you should look up the definition of the word "relative", moron. And keep bringing up Lara, Mayweather and anyone else who has absolutely **** all to do with this conversation in an attempt to deflect* from the topic at hand. *Another word that you may want to look up since you clearly have no idea what it means.
LMFAO this moron thinks deflect and relative are big words . Jesus christ, you're much dumber than I thought. Oh btw, I didn't bring Lara, or Mayweather in the post you just quoted, so again you proved that you have a double digit IQ. Keep proving that you're hate for Floyd is due to mostly Floyd though. Let me guess you have a GED :rofl. Anyways it was pretty obvious you wouldn't take my challenge.
I swear I always find it hilarious when high school drop outs learn a new word that almost any educated person knows, and tells someone to "look" up the definition because they just learned the word .
So he's done "nothing" to deserve a Mayweather fight but somehow enough that you believe he would kill Carl Froch? Just a minute ago you were saying that he's beaten "the best of 160". Jesus, you're all over the place.
You keep proving how low your IQ is . Yes, he's fought good opposition, but to fight Floyd when you're way bigger, you either have to have a huge name or have fought very elite opposition. He's beat good opposition at 160, but that's not good enough for a Floyd fight. GGG has been ducked by elite opposition or hgue names liek cotto/canelo and froch. He beats all 3 of them easy, but to get the Floyd fight he needs to beat at least 2 of them.
No, I just think you don't understand them, as you've clearly demonstrated here. :yep Now I'm a Floyd hater? Holy **** you need to put the bottle down, son. :rofl
It's called a typo , someone with an IQ as low as you wouldn't understand I clearly meant GGG. It's pretty obvious you suck floyds ****, and put him over the sport. I didn't expect much from someone that just learned the words "relative", and "deflect", and is going around trying to brag about their vocabulary.
Bull****. Canelo and Cotto have both headlined PPVs and Froch has sold out Wembley Stadium, FFS. They're all bigger names than Golovkin, but when they look at things from a risk/reward standpoint they're "ducking" and when Mayweather does it's because "Golovkin has done 'nothing' to deserve the fight". You're a ****rider plain and simple. :deal