(Yahoo) Mayweather exposed as chicken

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by guru059, Jul 27, 2010.


  1. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    You are too ****in stupid man...people do NOT have to prove their innocence if there's nothing to suggest they are guilty of anything to begin with. For some reason, uneducated mother ****ers like you just don't see that...and it's ghetto trash like you who should appreciate that notion the most!
     
  2. pedoro gomez

    pedoro gomez eliqueiros is the coolest Full Member

    130
    0
    Jul 24, 2010
  3. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    THAN WHY AREN'T MORE OF U *******S ABLE TO EXPOSE IT??:think:think

    HOW COME ALOT OF U *******S (AND URSELF INCLUDED IN THAT LIST LANCE) CANT GIVE A DECENT REBUTTAL SOMETIMES..

    EXACTLY...LANCE UR ARGUMENT IS WEAK..

    MY ARGUMENT IS BASED ON COMMENTS LIKE

    "WE WONT BE READY FOR FLOYD BY MARCH 13TH..FIGHTING FLOYD IS A DIFFERENT BALLGAME ALL TOGEATHER"

    OR "MEDIATOR FINDS ARUM IS MAKING FALSE ACCUSATIONS"


    JUST TO NAME A COUPLE ITEMS

    NOW TRY AGAIN LANCE.....EXPLAIN TO ME WHAT IS WRONG WITH ME BELIEVING MANNY PAC IS HIDING SOMETHING BASED ON HIM


    CONTINUOUSLY REACHING FOR EXCUSES,

    LOOKING AT THE ERA OF SPORTS WE ARE IN WITH PED'S AND HE WONT TAKE A SIMPLE RANDOM BLOOD TEST ..

    HIS TRAINERS OWN WORDS SAID THEY WOULDN'T BE READY THE FIRST TIME BUT PAC FANS DONT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT CUZ ROACH IS ONLY RIGHT WHEN HE SAYS THEY WOULD FIGHT FLOYD FOR A WINNER TAKE ALL RIGHT???

    HE HAS NOTHING TO LOSE FROM TAKING THE TESTS...


    JUST TO NAME A FEW...

    U JUST GOT OWNED LANCE..:hi::hi: :hat

    LET ME ASK YOU SOMETHING CUZ *******S ALWAYS AVOIDING THIS QUESTION.

    WHY IS IT THAT BEFORE BOB ARUMS DEADLINE ALL THE HATE WAS AT A LOWER LEVEL COMING OUT? LIKE A STAND STILL

    WHAT WAS SO SPECIAL ABOUT ARUMS DEADLINE? U ACT LIKE FLOYD HAS TO GO WITH ARUM'S DEADLINE CUZ ITS IN THE RULES:happy:happy:happy

    SO GO LOOK AT THE THREADS BEING MADE BEFORE ARUMS DEADLINE AND AFTER...U FUKIN PACQUIAO QUEENS STARTED RAISING THE LEVEL AFTER THAT AS IF ARUM IS FLOYDS PROMOTER AND HE WAS UNDER CONTRACT OR SOME $HIT
     
  4. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    this is surprising coming from Iole who is a huge Mayweather fan and seriously underrates Pacquiao
     
  5. 46and0

    46and0 It's irrefutable. Full Member

    7,011
    139
    Dec 6, 2008
    It's a decent article, but it's based on speculation. Nowhere does he mention that fact that Roger Mayweather is up for trial soon.
     
  6. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008

    maybe cuz mayweather had no other excuse other than im on vacation.
     
  7. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    :lol: Dude...I can only say this so many times...the argument you THINK you habve is irrelevant...it's meaningless. Go a head and think you've won something... but the reality is...this **** you keep saying OVER AND OVER means nothing...:patsch
     
  8. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    WHy should it? Floyd hasn't said anything about the trial being a factor now has he? All he said was he's on vacation.
     
  9. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Case closed. :deal
     
  10. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    YUP...BUT IT STILL HASN'T BEEN EXPOSED:hat

    I MEAN THERES REALLY **** U CAN SAY

    UR BOYS TRAINER SAID IT HIMSELF..THEY WOULDNT BE READY BY MARCH 13TH...

    U AVOIDED ARUMS DEADLINE TOO..JUST LIKE A *******
     
  11. 46and0

    46and0 It's irrefutable. Full Member

    7,011
    139
    Dec 6, 2008
    Well I wouldn't mention an impending trial before it reached court, due to the legal implications.
     
  12. JUSTAFIGHTFAN

    JUSTAFIGHTFAN Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,794
    0
    May 1, 2009
    Legal obligations only concerns parties involve or else it has no bearing. Other journalists, writers, critics already mentions them openly, unless Iole has interest on the case.
     
  13. PildiLagiMo

    PildiLagiMo Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,604
    1
    Dec 29, 2008
    exactamente.
     
  14. 46and0

    46and0 It's irrefutable. Full Member

    7,011
    139
    Dec 6, 2008
    Yeah but for him to disregard it totally is sloppy journalism. It has to be a factor. The two year vacation line is bull****. He's going by contradictions in what two boxers said, ODLH and Mayweather. Boxers are not known for their intelligence and contradict themselves all the time :lol:
     
  15. jerryrard

    jerryrard Member Full Member

    496
    0
    May 3, 2009
    You should not attempt to understand the mind of a ghetto trash, lest become one yourself. - Sigmund Freud