Years from now they'll say Hagler V Hearns was the first Golovkin V Lemieux

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Big Drama Show, Oct 12, 2015.


Page 2 of 3
  1. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,307
    29,485
    Apr 4, 2005
    Yes early losses happen but what has Lemiuex done since those losses that warrants him being compared to Hearns or Hagler?

    Golovkin/Lemieux may end up being a very exciting fight if Lemieux can get into the fight but let's not pretend this is a match up worthy of being compared to Hagler/Hearns, I'm not even sure if it's as good as Hagler/Mugabi.
     
    Brighton bomber, Oct 12, 2015
    Brighton bomber, Oct 12, 2015
    #16
  2. slender4

    slender4 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,959
    2,031
    Apr 26, 2006
    More like Hagler - Roldan
     
    slender4, Oct 12, 2015
    slender4, Oct 12, 2015
    #17
  3. slender4

    slender4 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,959
    2,031
    Apr 26, 2006
    ...Which was still a danm good fight.
     
    slender4, Oct 12, 2015
    slender4, Oct 12, 2015
    #18
  4. MidniteProwler

    MidniteProwler Fab 4. Mayor of Aussie Boxing Full Member

    27,177
    28,524
    Sep 19, 2012
    Agree with this, I was a big GGG fan up until the whole 164 catch weight BS.
     
    MidniteProwler, Oct 12, 2015
    MidniteProwler, Oct 12, 2015
    #19
  5. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,187
    5,402
    May 22, 2011
    GGG and Lemieux don't posses the same pedigree as Hagler and Hearns had when they fought so the comparison is flawed and contrary to popular belief the only similarity is in the power that will be on display.
     
    Manfred, Oct 12, 2015
    Manfred, Oct 12, 2015
    #20
  6. lewis gassed

    lewis gassed The Bronze Dosser Full Member

    25,429
    19,508
    Nov 24, 2013
    Shotguns :deal
    GGG hits like a 10 gauge :bbb
     
    lewis gassed, Oct 12, 2015
    lewis gassed, Oct 12, 2015
    #21
  7. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,246
    240,780
    Nov 23, 2013
    You're GGG hadn't lost 2 times and had 2 draws.:hey
     
    CST80, Oct 12, 2015
    CST80, Oct 12, 2015
    #22
  8. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,187
    5,402
    May 22, 2011
    Hagler and Hearns would run through GGG's resume in a week.
     
    Manfred, Oct 12, 2015
    Manfred, Oct 12, 2015
    #23
  9. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,246
    240,780
    Nov 23, 2013
    GGG would have never lost to Willie Monroe or Bobby Watts either.:deal
     
    CST80, Oct 12, 2015
    CST80, Oct 12, 2015
    #24
  10. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,187
    5,402
    May 22, 2011
    If they beat Hagler, they dam sure could GGG.
     
    Manfred, Oct 12, 2015
    Manfred, Oct 12, 2015
    #25
  11. slender4

    slender4 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,959
    2,031
    Apr 26, 2006
    Yeah he probably would have....if he had turned pro at 19. He lost to Andre Dirrell and Double-G.
     
    slender4, Oct 12, 2015
    slender4, Oct 12, 2015
    #26
  12. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,246
    240,780
    Nov 23, 2013
    That was the amateurs not the pros they're different remember.:deal And even then it was by a point or two, now lets drag those matches out from 3 to 12 rounds.:think
     
    CST80, Oct 12, 2015
    CST80, Oct 12, 2015
    #27
  13. FilipMNE

    FilipMNE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,394
    11
    Jul 3, 2011
    Except Lemiux aint good enough to carry their spit bucket.
     
    FilipMNE, Oct 12, 2015
    FilipMNE, Oct 12, 2015
    #28
  14. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,267
    38,043
    Aug 28, 2012
    Nah, the footage I've seen of that is just a lot of hugging and rough housing. It wasn't exciting. Besides, that was before they made it a rule that you had to wear shorts, so Papke was wearing assless chaps, a sumo thong, or something.
     
    OvidsExile, Oct 12, 2015
    OvidsExile, Oct 12, 2015
    #29
  15. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,267
    38,043
    Aug 28, 2012
    Ooh, I'd love to see him fight Dirrell at 168. Let him get his feet wet before taking on Ward, Jack, or Degale. But seriously he doesn't need super middleweight. This pay per view will make him a big enough draw that he can get Cotto, Canelo, Quillin, Lee, Jacobs, and his dance card is going to be full for the next few years.
     
    OvidsExile, Oct 12, 2015
    OvidsExile, Oct 12, 2015
    #30
Page 2 of 3