You are right, Floyd Jr, has never come out straight saying Pac juices. He has however made sly remarks and danced around the idea about the Philippines having some of the best PED's out there. Don't think that will be enough to own Floyd in a lawsuit, he never accused Pac directly. Indirectly maybe. Floyd ain't stupid.
If you idiots are so sure he's juicing then why do you even care about the loss of a megafight? You should stop any talk about Pac and boxing because the 2 do not go together, right? Just start pushing for Pac to be banned from boxing forever. That's what you should be talking about, not Pac boxing ever again.
I never said boxing and roids don't go together. I'm a realist and know full well that if someone can earn fame and cash by pushing a needle in his butt once or twice a week, with medical supervision, he will do it. From a legal and sport rule perspective it is obviously cheating. From a moral perspective, I do not consider doping to be wrong and there are many logical arguments to be made in favour of athletes doping, as long as the users are not jeopardazing their health (and despite bed time fairy tales to the contrary, not all doping is necessarily detrimental to one's health. Like virtually any subtance though, steroids can be abused, but this seems more like a personality problem than a substance problem). Here's a cogent argument in favour of doping: "To those who say that this will give drug users an unfair advantage, Savulescu replies that now, without drugs, those with the best genes have an unfair advantage. They must still train, of course, but if their genes produce more EPO than ours, they are going to beat us in the Tour de France, no matter how hard we train. Unless, that is, we take EPO to make up for our genetic deficiency. Setting a maximum level of red blood cells actually levels the playing field by reducing the impact of the genetic lottery. Effort then becomes more important than having the right genes." Source: http://www.utilitarian.net/singer/by/200708--.htm