Yet another bull**** decision

Yea that was very bad. Im on the Max bandwagon that was a very bad scorecard.

 

Ive got 3 judges, a crowd who was there, and 3 commentators who all agree Berto won.




Berto clearly won 7 rounds.

2 of the rounds he won could be 10-8.

 

are you guys idiots? it all came down to the last two score cards, which were only a 1 round difference.

 

What??
Clearly you did not watch the fight.

 

Why do boxing fans like crying robbery? It was a great fight two guys gave it all...WOW what a fight.

Yeah the 116-111 is Bull****. But the other 2 judges had it right, so either way its a victory for Berto. It could've gone either way but those two judges were scoring for Bertos harder cleaner punches. Besides compubox also had Berto landing more if you just count volume punches.

 

I have no bias at all for either fighter, and that decision was fookin' BULL ****!!!

 

Yea. I didn't do a round by round of the fight either.

atsch


You just didn't want Berto win.

 

I had Collazo by 1 round. Lederman had him by 3 points. The 116-111 judge should be removed, IMO.

 

I had it a draw. Put Berto clearly nearly put Collazo on his back in the 12th, and 114-113 is NOT a robbery. Just because you think one guy won in a fight as close as this does not make it a robbery. However, that 116-111 scorecard for Berto is straight disgusting.

Good effort for Collazo.

 

Did Lennox say there should be no rematch? If he did, he's full of it. He was literally making excuses for Berto in like the 10th or 11th round when he thought he was going to lose.

 

:good


One could argue 12 be a 10-8.

 

I thought it was too close to call, but that 116-111, as you say, was just horrible.

 

He said berto should not rematch Collazo right away. He didn't say not to rematch him at all.

 

stfu

 

Thats a bad scorecard.

115-112 would of been better.