Who said he was? If he wasn't shot to hell though, he'd have beaten this old version of Campas. Norberto Bravo beat this old version of Campas.
Ok so im supposed to believe Garcia whos 28 years old coming off TWO bad losses is supposed to be as shot or even shoter then Campas 36 years old veteran of of 100 fights. Dude get real Campas was having his ass handed to him by Vargas,Carr,Trinidad before Garcia even turned pro. Garcia isnt shot he just isnt very good its no wonder his only 3 fights vs Championship level fighters heading into this fight ended in him getting beat like a red headed step child. This is the 2nd time in the past 2 days ive caught your dumbass having dierhia of the mouth.
Campas won fewer rounds. With the point deduction, unless you were really scoring generously for him (there were a couple of close rounds), it should have been a loss. Very unfair decision on paper, IIRC.
Well maybe the ****'s on your hands, because you're putting an awful lot of words in my mouth. I didn't say he was very good, nor that he was more shot than YBC - you made all that up. The Garcia from the Rivera fight though, average though he was, should IMO have been able to beat this version of Campas, who is very, very poor (and yes, incredibly shot). It doesn't take a good fighter to beat him these days. That's all I was saying. :good
Ok then lets matchup the Garcia from 2 years ago im guessing the "prime" Garcia vs Campas off 15 years ago when he was it his prime and see what happens id bet my .... well I dont have much but to bet but anyway Campas would beat him like a drum.
Certainly. Why wouldn't that be the case? Why do you think I'm arguing with you? Where is all this hostility coming from? :huh