You can't win a fight landing 5 clean punches....

Wow, you are complaining about this style while having Paulie as your avatar. FAIL

 

i heard of a fighter winning a round without throwing a punch, was that a myth?

Anyway, i dont think they both deserved to win. Couldn't care less actually. Lets move on. Both will be eliminated if they fought that way against the others.

 

So winning the fight by mostly hitting 1 punch at a time and the rest for rabbit punching wins you the fight? Come on jeff. Dirrel yes was holding alot but he was landing, ducking, combination he did mostly everything. Even in the last 2 rounds when he barely run and hold. It was clearly a highway robbery.

 

Wrong jackass, was gale van hoy or donald sutherland the judges for froch-dirrell? no...I have no problems with dirrell using the ring, as I said in any many other threads, I'm partial to dirrell's style, but I scored it for froch, paulie doesnt hold, and then bitches while getting hit legally in the process like dirrell does....go have a nice big cup of shut the **** up:hi:

 

Paulie didn't stunned Diaz like what Dirrell did to Froch and Froch has the better chin then Diaz.

 

Paulie was robbed.................this robbery was even worse. Not in terms of judging but in terms of who won the fight. Diaz had rounds which you could maybe give to him......Froch didn't.

 

I said froch should have been deducted too, but the deduction on dirrell was justified IMO....dirrell admitted he gave the 12th away....and to say froch didnt land anything is not true...who was puffy and bleeding....

 

No he said Froch cameout in the second of the 12th round. Watch the 12th Froch didn't do **** until the last 20 seconds. Maybe Dirrell saying it by being to nice but no way the 12th was Froch. I guess doing something the last 20 seconds wins a fight huh? I didn't say Froch didn't land anything. I said Froch didn't land more then 1 punch at a time.

 

different thread different time....as I said who was puffy and and who was bleeding if froch "didnt land anything"....same with juan diaz against paulie, which paulie is featherfisted...

 

In fact he does hold, but obviously you wont be convinced otherwise. And I dont care what the names of the judges happen to be - an incompetent or biased judge should be held responsible for their decisions regardless. Why dont you get a cool avatar from the Ndou fight where Paulie had those great dreds. You know, the fight where Paulie got a gift decision so that he could be fed to a shot Hatton.

 

Who got stunned and was close to being tko in the 11th?

 

Fights concerning the judging is so subjective, the concepts are the same, but then so subjective.....the 12th I saw was dirrell boxing for the first 1:30 the rest was pretty sloppy and was a froch round....I said in many threads I saw 2 fights in 1....when it was pure boxing...dirrell won, but when it became ugly, I think the effectivness of the froch jab is being overlooked, as the poster vanillakilla brought up, and froch did some good body work, dirrell's countering faded and he abandoned it as the fight went on....it was a shitty fight I had it 6-5-1 froch....

People need to chill on the minority who say froch won...

 

I gave the 10th and and 11th to dirrell, the point deduction made the 10th even...

 

Seperate thread buddy, but paulie pitched a shutout the first half of that fight, and won a late round to get the win:good..how about the schooling in the first fight, aye?

 

Froch didn't land alot of jabs. He barely nail jabs with more then 1 time. Dirrell was clearly using his jab way better. And Dirrell was the one that was throwing combination in which most were landing. Why you keep ignoring my comment when i say "who got stunned badly and was close to being tko"?