You Have Three Wishes - Wish Away!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Addie, Aug 27, 2010.


  1. *BOX_FAN*

    *BOX_FAN* Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,540
    0
    Jul 5, 2007
    1.No discussion about size of the ring - always and everywhere the same size.
    2.Referee can watch a replay - something like in ice-hockey.
    3.One world champ belt in every division.
    Only 3 wishes? Damn! If so then at least I think all three have to come true:good.
     
  2. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    402
    Jun 14, 2006
    As provocative as ever, Marnoff. I'm not biting, though. :good
     
  3. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Regarding your second wish, I would say that they should have a panel of three guys that review every call throughout the fight as it happens. Then, in the event that there is CLEAR AND CONFIRMED EVIDENCE (as in ice-hockey) to the contrary of the official real-time call, they can overturn it. I think it would be too much for the referee to have to watch reviews between the round. I mean, sometimes you have to watch the thing five or more times to be sure.
     
  4. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Of course, of course.
     
  5. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    :lol:

    My three:

    1. One promotion company
    2. One organization, so one belt

    We would see far more top fights this way, fighters wouldn't be able to manipulate their way around the rankings and become the #1 without facing the best, or pick up a 'world title' without facing the best either. And we wouldn't have as many promotional disputes preventing fights either.

    And of course number 3, Mayweather vs Pacquiao.
     
  6. *BOX_FAN*

    *BOX_FAN* Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,540
    0
    Jul 5, 2007
    They could always make a bigger breaks between round :hey but honestly I wouldn't wish that. Well, my main purpose of that wish was for situations like 'if there was a knockdown or not' or 'is the cut because of a punch or a foul'. It's about situations that are now but it also could be used beetween rounds, why not? When for example X complains that Y fouls him all the time but he does it so smartly that the referee doesn't see it 'live' so he can check this out during a break and after that give -1 point for Y :hi:.
     
  7. Orthodox Stance

    Orthodox Stance Raw Talent Full Member

    416
    0
    Mar 4, 2010
    1) One governing body for the sport (like FIFA with football / soccer) - this would mean one belt per weight division, also universal regulations and one set of rankings per division
    2) Title fights 15 rounds and never at a 'catchweight'
    3) TV and internet coverage that is up to date with the times (I have to rely on on torrents and youtube most of the time)
     
  8. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Oh, ya, I mean, I absolutely agree that we should be using replays. I was just thinking maybe the referee isn't the guy who should do the reviewing since there's such a short time between rounds and the referee often has other things to be doing.
     
  9. Grillinnap

    Grillinnap Flomos are morons Full Member

    6,312
    0
    Dec 1, 2009
    1) Boxing (amateur, of course, with head guard) in high school and college
    2) Boxing on network television
    3) Boxing Channel (much like the Golf Channel, Tennis channel, Speed Channel, etc.)
     
  10. J.E.Cash

    J.E.Cash Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,302
    8
    May 5, 2009
    1. Rounds: 15 Rounds for title fights
    2. Weight Classes: Less classes - Catchweights not allowed!!!
    3. May vs. Pac
     
  11. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,200
    28,088
    Jul 26, 2004
    - All boxing is under one huge global company
    - Only 1 belt per weightclass
    - Smaller gloves


    I think through these three, much of what is ailing boxing would be fixed.

    If boxing was under one roof, they could package it like the UFC does, this means i could go to stores and buy a Miguel Cotto poster, or go rent Ward vs Gatti trilogy at my local video store. I think this would lead to an expansion in fanbase as well.

    If there was only one belt, this is self explanatory.

    And id like to see smaller gloves, personally. I cant stand when it looks like the fighters are fighting with pillows on.



    ALMOST MADE THE CUT
    - i would have more tournies, but with less time in between fights. I think that every few years or so, this would provide good challengers to a dominant champion.
    - No catchweight fights
     
  12. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Well, we have the Fight Network, but it has a lot of MMA on it, which I'm not crazy about on the low level.
     
  13. allfields123

    allfields123 New Member Full Member

    14
    0
    Nov 15, 2009
    1. One belt per division
    2. No Catch weights
    3. Klitschko vs. Klitschko
     
  14. Kissan

    Kissan I respect box Full Member

    1,354
    222
    Mar 1, 2010
    1) One title for every division
    2) Fewer divisions, e.g. Feather, Light, Middle, Light Heavy, Heavy
    3) Same terms for anyone ( ring size, rules inside the ring, etc. maybe even the money has to be unitized
     
  15. jeffjoiner

    jeffjoiner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,183
    5
    Jun 22, 2008
    1. One Champ per division.
    2. A "Super Bowl Weekend" style event. One day a year, 3-4 title fights. Same weekend every year.
    3. Harold Lederman and the old drunk guy go away.