You think froch won? Wtf omg lol

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lastletter26, Oct 18, 2009.


Page 1 of 3
  1. lastletter26

    lastletter26 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,856
    1
    Nov 13, 2008
    So what do you have to say about FROCH NOT HITTING DIRRELL'S FACE 20 TIMES IN THE WHOLE FIGHT, WHILE GETTING HIS HEAD SNAPPED BACK BY DIRRELL ON A REGULAR BASIS. Not one person who said froch won had anything to combat that point. THe only way to justify a close fight is to say that you believe froch was landing those airball flurries not touching a thing. If you believe froch won then that is your only excuse. Ignorance of not knowing what punches are landing and what punches aren't. Everytime they showed a froch replay you could see that froch was missing almost every punch of his flurry. During the fight you didn't need a replay to see froch's head snapping back as he was caught with pretty much the only flush, sharp big shots in the fight besides froch's hook in the 8th round (which was his only real shot of the fight).

    YOu can talk about how you don't like how either of them fight but you can't take away the fact that one guy was getting his head snapped back consistently every round and landed the harder, sharper and only punches in the fight. To add insult to injury, froch was wobled twice in the fight.
     
    lastletter26, Oct 18, 2009
    lastletter26, Oct 18, 2009
    #1
  2. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,139
    10,561
    Jul 28, 2009
    Okay, but how many of the same thread do we need? We're getting flooded with the same thing. They're everywhere.
     
    Boxed Ears, Oct 18, 2009
    Boxed Ears, Oct 18, 2009
    #2
  3. Medicine

    Medicine Boxing Addict banned

    4,277
    4
    Dec 6, 2008
    Dont even sweat it. In every poll the poeple who think Dirrell won is overwhelmingly more then the morons who thought Froch won.
     
    Medicine, Oct 18, 2009
    Medicine, Oct 18, 2009
    #3
  4. gorgse

    gorgse Active Member Full Member

    1,393
    0
    Oct 20, 2008
    dude, Dirrell lost.. get over it
     
    gorgse, Oct 18, 2009
    gorgse, Oct 18, 2009
    #4
  5. Medicine

    Medicine Boxing Addict banned

    4,277
    4
    Dec 6, 2008
    Keep telling yourself that.
     
    Medicine, Oct 18, 2009
    Medicine, Oct 18, 2009
    #5
  6. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,524
    34
    Jan 20, 2007


    That's what happens when there is outrage. I hate Dirrell's pre fight fake personality, his crappy avoidant tactics in the ring, but I am still sane enough to recognize that he won by a thick margine, largely because he made Froch totally clueless and inaccurate, while landing a few sharp punches in most rounds. It is not logically inconsistent to 1. be disgusted by Dirrell's style, 2. Not to be entertained by this fight and to even blame most of it on Dirrell and 3. To know enough about boxing to see who landed more and better punches.
     
    lzolnier, Oct 18, 2009
    lzolnier, Oct 18, 2009
    #6
  7. dumdane

    dumdane Member Full Member

    198
    0
    Apr 14, 2005
    Great! We've now established that there are more american biased posters than british biased posters on these boards.

    That aside. Calling it a dodgy decission is def. valid. Dirrell lands more clean shots. But it was a close ugly fight. Froch being the defending champ and showing more agression and will to fight. Far from the highway robbery ppl are shouting about.
    Far worse robberies out there. In the great US of A too.
     
    dumdane, Oct 18, 2009
    dumdane, Oct 18, 2009
    #7
  8. zarman

    zarman Guest

    this is getting boring now, it was a close fight that could have gone either way. dirrel should blame himself for losing rounds he could have won by engaging more. the main thing i learned from this fight is that its clear nether will win the tournament.
     
    zarman, Oct 18, 2009
    zarman, Oct 18, 2009
    #8
  9. Loggo

    Loggo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,029
    2
    Mar 26, 2006
    For ****s sake although Dirrel lost he`s not out of the tournament, is there anymore need for the Froch hatred?
     
    Loggo, Oct 18, 2009
    Loggo, Oct 18, 2009
    #9
  10. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,524
    34
    Jan 20, 2007


    So I guess only two countries provide access to the internet?
     
    lzolnier, Oct 18, 2009
    lzolnier, Oct 18, 2009
    #10
  11. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    This content is protected
    :deal
     
    Anglosaxon, Oct 18, 2009
    Anglosaxon, Oct 18, 2009
    #11
  12. Intense

    Intense Active Member Full Member

    904
    40
    Apr 30, 2008
    This content is protected
     
    Intense, Oct 18, 2009
    Intense, Oct 18, 2009
    #12
  13. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,524
    34
    Jan 20, 2007
    boxer: Sven Ottke

    This content is protected
    +
    This content is protected
    +
    This content is protected
    = 34
    rounds boxed 331 KO% 17.65
     
    lzolnier, Oct 18, 2009
    lzolnier, Oct 18, 2009
    #13
  14. dumdane

    dumdane Member Full Member

    198
    0
    Apr 14, 2005
    It has SUPPOSEDLY spread outside of those two places lately. But from my position here in Denmark I don't put too much faith in those silly rumours.
     
    dumdane, Oct 18, 2009
    dumdane, Oct 18, 2009
    #14
  15. monr31

    monr31 Member Full Member

    208
    0
    Apr 8, 2009
    dan rafael from espn thinks froch won, and he had dirrell as his favorite going in
     
    monr31, Oct 18, 2009
    monr31, Oct 18, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 3