You who are UNIMPRESSED by PETER

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Suge Green, Aug 20, 2007.


  1. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,921
    35
    Mar 31, 2007
    IMO, Peter will get the job done against Oleg.
     
  2. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,828
    3,038
    Apr 16, 2005
    Johnson never seemed like a big puncher to me. Always seemed to me more of a boxer-type - and a good one at that. I understand he is BY FAR the best of the three, and if he didn't spend so much time in the Mickey D's drive thru, he actually could have done something in the divsion. But that he blew out Oleg so badly when he's not reallly known as a hard hitter is further evidence of just HOW bad Maskaev's chin is. Regardless, I don't think too many people would argue that Peter hits harder than ANY of those guys - and chins don't improve with age.
     
  3. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Do you agree that Virchis troubled Chagaev? Virchis is not on Peter's level as a power punching pressure fighter, he's much slower, has lesser of a punch, taller but not as physically imposing and his chin is not there.

    Would Virchis beat Maskaev? Virchis has a damn good shot, because Maskaev is as slow as he is. If you answer yes, then picking Maskaev over Peter, who in turn is 3x the fighter that Virchis is, is simply not looking at it straight.

    Peter has big power, a cast iron chin, a solid workrate, a developing jab, great movement for a big man, improving offensive skill and on top of it - good handspeed.

    Now where does he not compare with Chagaev? Chagaev is more of a euro-boxer puncher and Peter is a pressuring slugger, styles are different but being more boxer oriented does not mean you have more advantages over intangibles over the 'proficient slugger'. Peter's game is to cut off the ring and bomb you out, Chagaev's game is to fight paced and work behind a tight guard and a jab, these go well together, but Peter's pressure would get Chagaev and his power would allow him to bomb Chagaev out or win a wide decision, either way.

    And Maskaev is even lesser, he will be removed in round 1.:good

    Let me be fair though, Chagaev also KO's Maskaev early, this is not just talking up Peter, it's talking of just how vulnerable Maskaev is.
     
  4. madpup

    madpup Active Member Full Member

    1,061
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    As I told you before, I did not see Chagaev vs Virchis. As for Maskaev vs Peter, I think it is a 50/50 fight, simply because Maskaev is a far smarter fighter and I expect him to come totally prepared and with a smart gameplan, whilst I have no confidence in Peter coming with with any gameplan other than come in and swing wildly.
    The only thing I agree with you about Peter is his power and chin, and maybe movement, but his improving offensive skill is a mystery to me. Anyone can look good fighting a completely shot opponent.
    The big thing to me is the fact that Peter's defensive 'ability' is a good as that of a punching bag. I can see Chagaev landing flush at Peter again and again, much like for the Valuev fight. IMO Chagaev will win a wide UD.
     
  5. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Yes, but the opponent has nothing to do with displaying a new set of skills, do you get that? Prior to Toney 2, Peter fought a bunch of journeymen and didn't display those new offensive skills because he didn't have them, he couldn't have displayed them against a shot opponent had he not been developing them to start with.

    The opponent logic goes only so far when we're talking technicalities, if you want to say that he can't pull off his new combinations, which have good handspeed against better opponents, then that is fine, but Oleg even at this point is slower and easier to hit than a shot James Toney, trust me on that one. The one thing you can't say regardless of whether you think he can use his developing skill set on a superior opponent, is that he hasn't been developing them, otherwise we'd have never saw any difference in him and we saw it clear as crystal.
     
  6. Grabonator

    Grabonator Active Member Full Member

    947
    1
    Apr 15, 2007
    OMG are you stupid!!:lol:
     
  7. Grabonator

    Grabonator Active Member Full Member

    947
    1
    Apr 15, 2007
    Verry good post, i have to agree!
     
  8. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    What are you? 12 years old? :patsch
     
  9. Marciano Frazier

    Marciano Frazier Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    55
    Jul 20, 2004
    Your options are far, far too limited. Apparently you have to either think he's about to knock a top 10 heavyweight's head off every second or that there's no chance he ever will.

    I think the odds are that if Peter hangs around for a few more years, he will probably stop at least one top 10 opponent somewhere along the way, maybe more. In fact, I think the odds are pretty good he will knock out Maskaev in their upcoming showdown. However, even assuming he does stop a top 10 opponent, that is hardly a unique feat and would not prove him to have the freakish, ungodly punching power sometimes attributed to him. I find those sorts of accolades in his case to be extremely premature and unwarranted. Clearly, Peter hits hard- much harder than an average heavyweight- but his track record in terms of punching power against credible opposition has been decidedly unremarkable and placing him among the elite power punchers of all time and the like, as is sometimes done by his supporters, is unreasonable and unwarranted, in my opinion.
     
  10. curmudgeon

    curmudgeon Active Member Full Member

    1,344
    0
    Jun 17, 2007
    That is what they said about his fight with Wlad. Did not happen.

    Oleg is no Wlad, but he is just as smart, and he can box a bit, or two. I would not be so confident in Peter.
     
  11. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    All valid points....

    You also must remember Peter is not the same Peter from the Wlad fight, I think he understands the laws of conservation much better than he did 2yrs ago. I find it strange that people have not recognized his improvements, espeacially during the second Toney fight. Oleg's chin is less impressive and so is his defense when compared to the Toney, I think Sam will impress the masses and pull out a great KO on Oleg. Just my opinion.
     
  12. Odo

    Odo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,145
    167
    Jul 25, 2004
    Well spoken!

    Peter for sure can punch,but he is a bit overrated my some posters here on esb IMO.
    Average Croation heavy weight Jovo Pudar was able to go the full route with him,and so was that fat dwarf Toney.
    Vidoz kicked him out of the olympic tournament,and he couldnt hold a candle to former amateur superstar Povetkin at the amateurs.
     
  13. BoxingGuru

    BoxingGuru Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,458
    3
    Jan 21, 2007
    I watched Peter/Toney II last night again. I cannot believe this ****ing cheater how many times he purposefully tried to hit Toney behind the head. If the referee allows that, it is a crime.

    Watch it and tell me this ****er isn't a fraud.
     
  14. Fighting Weight

    Fighting Weight Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    3
    Jan 10, 2005
    He can't hit that hard, he never KO'd WALDO.
     
  15. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    You severly overrate Peter. Based on what? His win over Taurus Sykes? Or maybe Yankme Diaz?

    Peter may well KO Oleg but he wouldn't be the first to KO "The Big O" anyway. So what would it say about Peter's percieved power? It would just mean that Oleg is too old & he made a mistake that Sam capitalized on.

    The difference between Wladimir & Sam is huge. Wlad KO's fighters who haven't been previously KO'd, and he does it in brutal fashion.