so can you explain how jmm beat the crap out of pacquiao? of course you will since it's pretty obvious. bradley, only has 1 clear round (round 10) and if you'll be generous, give him round 1, 11 and 12. even if you have marquez winning, he didn't beat the crap out of pac like pac beating the crap out of bradley in those middle rounds (round 3-8 ).
daruf is an emotional wreck when it comes to the topic of pac-jmm3 and could not think clearly. he thought that jmm beat the crap out of pacquiao like pac made bradley clinch for dear life.
Or people laughing at pac fans crying robbery when he has been on the right side of bad decisions. Most know and will admit pac won. How many pac fans admit he lost to jmm.
You are such a **** it's unreal. Bradley lost this one, Pacquiao lost the last one. Deal with it and move the **** on, you hypocrite.
clearly you can't read? i said i have no problem if you think jmm won the last fight. it was close and could have gone either way. but can you explain how jmm beat the crap out of pacquiao just like what daruf said?
Keep ignoring 90% of the writers, fans, experts and analysts out there that all believe JMM won. I am not a emotional wreck over any fight but seeing a fighter get robbed disgusts me every time. Hence im disgusted that Pac got robbed vs Bradley. But you keep sucking off Pacs nuts and believe he wins every single fight no matter what the actual outcome is. You will always be a pac hugger and not a boxing fan and will gladly cheer a robbery as long as it benefits your fighter. Thats ultimately the difference between you and me, im a boxing fan you are not.
I'm sorry that you allowed the commentators to lead you down this silly "Manny dominated" path...I'm sure that had to make it sting a little more.