I don't think anyone is claiming Floyd's resume is ****. He should have maybe won it if he didn't do his fake retirement/ducking move.
Sugar Ray fought every single month in a different era. Losing 1 in 10 fights isn't a great record for an elite fighter in this era, considering he's had a few lose decisions too.
You used to be a real decent, knowledgable poster on this board. Now you're more of a walking encyclopedia of excuses. Stop sipping the haterade.
Stop sourgraping on Pacquiao's fighter of the decade award. You'd nitpick Robinson's career if it'd put your idol in a better light. :-(
You cant go wrong with having floyd, pacquiao, or hopkins as 1,2, and 3 in any order....All 3 can make a case for fighter of the decade imo...
No, not really. That avatar doesn't show I hate Floyd's skills. I have it there to display Floyd's hypocrisy and to enrage all the *****s (not decent Floyd fans, just *****s).
The fighter of the decade SHOULD be Mayweather... but he retired from the sport for 2 years, within that 2 years manny mania became even wilder. Manny argubly lost to Marquez twice. I feel he won the first fight, but if you think about it... he actually got beat clearly in a tough fight. He knocked the guy down 3 times in the first round only to get a draw or what should've been a 1 point decision win???? It's losing win, to be honest. But there would be no question had Mayweather not retired for 2 years. He is back but people already decided. But he should've got it to be honest...manny was not as dominate as Mayweather nor as Brillant. But may wanted to retire for 2 years of his prime... so I have no negative thoughts about Manny getting it.