Your Khan-Petterson Scorecard without the knockdown and Point Deductions

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Brauer, Dec 10, 2011.


Page 1 of 3
  1. Brauer

    Brauer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,565
    2
    Oct 15, 2011
    I had it 114-114.
     
    Brauer, Dec 10, 2011
    Brauer, Dec 10, 2011
    #1
  2. Polish-Delight

    Polish-Delight Member Full Member

    215
    0
    Jun 29, 2011
    No way. Khan by 116-112
     
    Polish-Delight, Dec 10, 2011
    Polish-Delight, Dec 10, 2011
    #2
  3. tman17tm

    tman17tm Member Full Member

    168
    5
    May 27, 2009
    Khan 116-112, should've won even with the deductions...
     
    tman17tm, Dec 10, 2011
    tman17tm, Dec 10, 2011
    #3
  4. BoneCollecter

    BoneCollecter Warrior Poet Full Member

    796
    0
    Feb 9, 2008
    Khan won by a pubic hair
     
    BoneCollecter, Dec 10, 2011
    BoneCollecter, Dec 10, 2011
    #4
  5. dvb

    dvb Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,826
    1
    Mar 16, 2010
    i cant remember peterson landing any really decent combinations,cant remember him out throwing or outlanding khan,didnt do better with ring generalship.

    khan clearly won a close ish fight.

    lamont knows this.

    khan will have rematch won aslong not in D.C!

    the ref and scorecards should be investigated,highly supsicous with how long cards took to announce.
     
    dvb, Dec 10, 2011
    dvb, Dec 10, 2011
    #5
  6. Redondo5

    Redondo5 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,703
    16
    Nov 11, 2007
    Didn't score the fight, but thought khan would scrape a decision without point deductions.

    Who the **** was this referee? Had he done any big fights before?
     
    Redondo5, Dec 10, 2011
    Redondo5, Dec 10, 2011
    #6
  7. lewishamboy

    lewishamboy Styles Impetuous Full Member

    9,101
    0
    Jul 15, 2007
    Khan by 2 rounds at best. Very close fight though, congrats to Peterson he fought a great fight.
     
    lewishamboy, Dec 10, 2011
    lewishamboy, Dec 10, 2011
    #7
  8. errsta

    errsta Boxing Addict banned

    6,321
    1
    Jul 31, 2004
    Khan eeked out a close win.

    Had the 12th round deduction been for hitting on the break it would have been justified, IMHO...

    strange that HBO/GBP would allow an unproven/unknown ref for a fighter they're banking on.

    Khan did enough to get the win, though.

    I do, however, think it's hilarious that the same people that insist Froch rightfully got the nod against Dirrell are ignoring that Khan (literally) ran A LOT more than Dirrell. Small consolation.
     
    errsta, Dec 10, 2011
    errsta, Dec 10, 2011
    #8
  9. Hydro11

    Hydro11 Active Member Full Member

    1,137
    1
    Jun 2, 2011
    115-114 Peterson
     
    Hydro11, Dec 10, 2011
    Hydro11, Dec 10, 2011
    #9
  10. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    79
    May 30, 2009
    I had it a draw so without that it would have been Khan by a point.
     
    PetethePrince, Dec 10, 2011
    PetethePrince, Dec 10, 2011
    #10
  11. Alien

    Alien Chin Scholar Full Member

    5,384
    39
    Jun 12, 2011
    Are you drunk? Seriously?
     
    Alien, Dec 10, 2011
    Alien, Dec 10, 2011
    #11
  12. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,873
    Apr 30, 2006
    Had it Khan, 7-5.
     
    Rock0052, Dec 10, 2011
    Rock0052, Dec 10, 2011
    #12
  13. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,873
    Apr 30, 2006
    It's funny you should bring up Froch-Dirrell, because this fight left the exact same taste in my mouth in one big regard. I've posted this same opinion in my Dirrell-Froch post fight comments :

    It was frustrating as **** to witness a visiting fighter not expect home town bias. Both Dirrell and Khan fought like they weren't expecting it when there's thousands of examples of boxing history that show how likely it is to happen. That's a real world factor that must be accounted for, and the time to adjust for that is before the fight. Noticing it afterwards just shows they didn't do their ****ing history homework.

    It's not fair that that's the way boxing is, but that aspect of the sport has been there from the beginning. Fighters cannot afford to ignore that reality.
     
    Rock0052, Dec 10, 2011
    Rock0052, Dec 10, 2011
    #13
  14. errsta

    errsta Boxing Addict banned

    6,321
    1
    Jul 31, 2004
    :deal:deal

    Quality post, good sir.
     
    errsta, Dec 10, 2011
    errsta, Dec 10, 2011
    #14
  15. Rexrapper 1

    Rexrapper 1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,405
    420
    Aug 23, 2010
    113-112 for Khan, I think.
     
    Rexrapper 1, Dec 10, 2011
    Rexrapper 1, Dec 10, 2011
    #15
Page 1 of 3