Your New Idea's and Concepts To Make Boxing Better

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by BrummyLad, Dec 21, 2009.


  1. BrummyLad

    BrummyLad Sergio Kun Aguero Full Member

    2,197
    0
    Nov 19, 2009
    First; I'd have a rule where all champions were imposed with stricter controls on there title defences, straight away you would see the best fights made and some up-and-comers getting shots. Stops the champion holding the belts hostage and fighting no marks.

    Second; If a champion isnt active in 6 months he recinds his title with immediate effect no excuses (if the champ is injured he gets a shot against the new champ once he has healed and got back in top condition), stops fighters fading away and holding the title hostage and keeps things ticking over and keeps interest.

    Third; Get rid this 'Super Champ' 'Interim' 'Champion in recess' bollocks. Your either Champ or your not, you can be known as NO1 contender but that is all.

    Fourth; No promoter politics, a fighter should be part of a ranking system that is totally independent from all sources and is there only for the welfare of boxing, every fight should have to donate a small figure of cash to keep the organisation (who are non profit making) going. No bigwigs just fans of boxing who delegate for the best of boxing i.e mosley v mayweather to be made otherwise belts get confiscated.

    Fifth; 5 judges and all have access to replays and computer scoring systems to aid them with their decision making.

    Feel free to add as we go and thanks in advance, thoughts...
     
  2. Lee Mc

    Lee Mc Boxing Addict banned

    7,107
    3
    Jan 12, 2009
    If we are to have so many "world titles" I think an agreement should be made that no-one is allowed to defend their title against someone lower than 4th in the ratings. I will never respect the alphabet titles but this would be a step in the right direction.

    Secondly, although possible the least likely to happen, I would like to see a ban on fighters signing exclusivity contracts with promoters. I think the governing bodies should announce what fights are to be made and allow all promoters a chance to bid on each and every fight. This would, in theory, eliminate the possibility of two fighters failing to meet each other simply because one is, for example, Don King and the other with Bob Arum.
     
  3. TheUzi

    TheUzi MISSION INCOMPLETE Full Member

    7,358
    0
    Jul 23, 2008
    The worst thing about boxing in a sick way is the best thing.

    Politics hinder the biggest fights happening regularly but when a big fight comes together,the buzz you get on fight night is unbelievable,some fights are literally years in the making.

    Judging is something which has to be overhauled completely.
     
  4. mcguirpa

    mcguirpa Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,965
    118
    Feb 15, 2009
    I agree totally.

    The best thing about boxing is it's a totally free market. Money talks, bull**** walks, so to speak.

    On judging, the system is a disgrace. Completely unfit for purpose and too subjective.

    I'd like to see the end of 10 pt. must and (although I was shot down for it before) more judges.

    On the 10 pt. must systems, can anyone give me a clue as to its origins?
     
  5. RichT

    RichT Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,907
    0
    Oct 17, 2009
    There are too many dodgy rankings and champions. I personally wouldn't go as far as saying I'd like to see just one champion per division (I think it would be interesting to have 2) but I think the governing bodies do need a shake up so that we could eliminate some of them and ensure fairness in the ones left. It's crazy that a fighter isn't ranked by one organisation just because he is high up or a champion of another.

    The judging system needs to be looked at too. There have been too many disputable decisoins this year and it's damaging the sport. Not sure what I'd propose to fix it but being clearer and more consistent about the way in which a fight is scored may help.
     
  6. brown bomber

    brown bomber 2010 Poster of the Year Full Member

    30,856
    17
    Jul 1, 2006
    Set up a universal governing body (FIBA) and elect representatives from each respective board of each country.

    Disqualify all 'charity' governing bodies.

    Nominate each champion to face off in mini tournaments. Rid all non essential titles.

    Universal Governing body to recieve applications for voluntary title defences. Applications to be approved by majority decision.

    Universal Governing Body to generate own ratings in each division. Appeals can be administered via the 'sanction fee' which is to always be fair and never exceed 10% of gross profit per show.

    Magazines/ Websites and Broadcasters to ignore all titles unless the FIBA have approved.

    FIBA to have there own website where fans can find out about each of the champion with links to their websites, videos and also a brief career/life story.

    Music and beer at all boxing shows between rounds.

    Screens at all boxing shows where possible.

    Greater care paid to production of programmes.

    Consensus scoring to be put in place with five judges for all major title fights. Referees to be approved by FiBa prior to world title performances.

    Oh yeah... this would start sorting the **** out.
     
  7. BrummyLad

    BrummyLad Sergio Kun Aguero Full Member

    2,197
    0
    Nov 19, 2009
  8. TheUzi

    TheUzi MISSION INCOMPLETE Full Member

    7,358
    0
    Jul 23, 2008
    How about judges who are respected and involved with the sport in some way.
     
  9. Havik

    Havik Active Member Full Member

    842
    0
    Oct 11, 2008
    Apply the rules and punish boxers for clinching. It's annoying, it's against the rules and worst of all: it bores the public. First clinch: warning, second: point deduction, etc...
    Pushing this through might lead to a few disqualifications in the beginning, but it would be worth it.
     
  10. pne buz

    pne buz Active Member Full Member

    1,173
    87
    Apr 20, 2008
    Didnt Terry Marsh try something in the mid 80s on this subject?
     
  11. Lee Mc

    Lee Mc Boxing Addict banned

    7,107
    3
    Jan 12, 2009
    Yes. He retired.
     
  12. pne buz

    pne buz Active Member Full Member

    1,173
    87
    Apr 20, 2008
    Exactly what i meant.You dont think for one second i would suggest that shooting a promoter would improve boxing do you!
     
  13. Mazallan

    Mazallan ESB yes man Full Member

    7,522
    0
    Jun 25, 2009
    Make the gloves alot smaller. Boxers are just not skillful anymore. We need to get back to the early day's of the sport plus all those guys who think they can take a punch to land one because they are the prospect will have to actually learn the trade.
     
  14. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    15 rounds and one ranking organisation; seperate the men from the boys.

    Regular fights between top opposition.

    If Valero were fighting in the 40's/50's he'd have fought Katsidis, Funeka, Soto and Guzman within three months, to put things into perspective.

    Sadly, the state of the game WILL NEVER ALLOW IT TO HAPPEN.
     
  15. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    I must say small gloves make fighters throw less combinations and turn the punches over incorrectly.

    Depends how small you mean I guess? The kinda' gloves Gavilan/Robinson wore would be ideal for me:good