Robberies are fights that aren't even close where the clear winner doesn't get the victory. Perfect examples are Whitaker vs Chavez Sr., Lewis vs Holyfield I...etc. Did you honestly see the fight one-sided in favor of Golovkin?. If so, congratulations on your peanuts for brains, it's rather common among Golovkin fans.
First fight I went with Canelo. This fight I go with 3G. I still don't have a side I feel firmly about. I can't go to bat for my reasoning. I figured they were pretty close so back the fellow hispano. They're doing a rematch, still seems rather close to me, may as well back the other guy. I could flip a coin on it and be fine with that.
lol... was it onesided? no but its clear who won the fight GGG did.. so rewatch the fight before you go calling people names if you actually think it deserved a draw then you need to find a new sport.. then again you got a Mayweather pic as your profile... I should know better.. most Mayweather fans brains are about as good as his reading skills
I said most Mayweather fans I met on here. I like you so if your a Mayweather fan your a good one lol
Neither fighter deserved to win because both looks horrible and unimpressive. Alvarez ran out of gas fairly quickly and wasn't active enough, while Golovkin barely looked like Mike Tyson x10 like his mentally slow fans claimed he was viewing his countless fights against overly matched bums. A Golovkin fan mentioning reading skills, now that's comedy. I'd be more worried about my speaking skills as a Golovkin fan before bothering with reading.