Your Ranking of Larry Holmes?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Russell, Apr 5, 2008.


  1. RoccoMarciano

    RoccoMarciano Blockbuster Full Member

    2,892
    16
    Jan 15, 2007
    Top 10 for sure, but four seems a bit high.
     
  2. pugilistspecialist

    pugilistspecialist Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,966
    8
    Jul 19, 2004
    not to mentiona 37 year old brown bomber, and 33 year old Charles with 100 pro fights who started at middleweight....Yea Marciano beat a host of prime great heavyweights:patsch
     
  3. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,990
    11,861
    Aug 22, 2004
  4. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,973
    13,342
    Apr 1, 2007
    I honestly couldn't put him out of my top five, to be honest,
     
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,201
    49,499
    Apr 27, 2005
    I highly disagree, but Holmes is one of these rare critters one can argue both for and against with a fair bit of conviction. As a fighter i really rate the guy. Nobody could convince me there's 5 heavyweights ever taht could ALL beat him, not that my list is purely H2H.
     
  6. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,737
    3,589
    Jul 10, 2005
    Marciano clean out his era. Holmes didnt.
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,201
    49,499
    Apr 27, 2005
    I won't argue with anyone having Marciano ahead. I have him right behind Holmes. People can put Marciano anywhere from 3 to 6 and i'll only applaud. At the end of the day his record is flawless. Personally i couldn't put him above Ali or Louis, but hey, some could whip up some good debate i bet.
     
  8. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
  9. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,737
    3,589
    Jul 10, 2005
    I dont try to have them in dream matchs because its all guess work. We cant even get TODAYS fights right, what makes us relly think we can guess a fighter from one era vs other fighter from other era right??

    Ali and Louis are number 1 and 2 of couse. Both rein long, both clean out there divsions so to speak, and both fought the best of there era.
    Of couse they both had styles that will last longer than a swamer like Marciano or Joe Fraizer, and that type of fighter will be top dog for a few years, perhaps 3 or 4. I cant dream of Joe Fraizer reining for 12 years as heavyweight champ with the style he applie. So they burn out faster of couse.
    But in Holmes Marciano debate, I do rank the Rock over Holmes, because Marciano did clean out his era, and fought the best, and did give rematchs vs Walcott, and charles, and LarSarza, when they needed it. Also Holmes took on far too many 15-0 and 10-0 fighters for my taste to be rank over Marciano.

    Dempsey takes a major hit with his rein, and 3 year break, and of couse failing to battle Harry Wills.
     
  10. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,201
    49,499
    Apr 27, 2005
    Dempsey isn't in my ten, so no worries there.

    Personally i do factor in a little percieved head to head tho i see your point. Strictly speaking resume Marciano is hard to argue against.
     
  11. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,737
    3,589
    Jul 10, 2005
    I was pretty sure the first time Taylor would beat Pavlik lol. I had Pavlik by ko in the rematch.
     
  12. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,201
    49,499
    Apr 27, 2005
    In some ways present fights are harder to pick than cross era.
     
  13. RoccoMarciano

    RoccoMarciano Blockbuster Full Member

    2,892
    16
    Jan 15, 2007
    I clobber him more for his personality than anything else. I know that is a little dense, but it is something that comes into play, for me, regarding some fighters.

    In any event, Holmes is a perpetual top ten HW in my book :good
     
  14. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,973
    13,342
    Apr 1, 2007
    So Cocco admits to ranking fighters using all the wrong criteria.

    Shocking.
     
  15. RoccoMarciano

    RoccoMarciano Blockbuster Full Member

    2,892
    16
    Jan 15, 2007
    Dempsey is an enigma to me regarding proper rating. I'm not trying to start anything, but I've serious doubts the guy was really as good as some make him out to be.