Your top 5 all time lightweights and a little of why...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by timmers612, Oct 4, 2008.


  1. timmers612

    timmers612 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,018
    415
    Sep 25, 2005
    I've wrestled over this one for years and am still not sure.

    1) Joe Gans. Not allot of reasons not to have him here unless that first McGovern hook really did hurt him. Great endurance, a highly skilled boxer and combination puncher who had ko power in both hands. Nat Fleisher thought the world of Benny Leonard but rated Gans just a speck higher, having seen them both, and Leonard concured. If Gans had TB when he fought Nelson it adds to what his ability was like at his best.

    2) Benny Leonard. A little faster and with more tools all around then Floyd Mayweather, as much of a boxing master as Willy Pep but with more power. Not allot of space between him and Gans.

    3) Roberto Duran. His fights with Edwin Viruet and Ray Lampkin lead me to think the above two might have edged him. Still, I wouldn't argue with anyone who puts him first!

    4) Pernell Witaker. Along with Pep, perhaps the two greatest defensive boxers of all time. Almost untouchable at his best and seldom lost a round then. His very close bouts with some, such as his first 1pt win over the one armed Buddy Mcgirt, might have seen the above two able to outscore him over fifteen.

    5) Ike Williams. Highly skilled, great killer instict, power in both hands, and mean.
     
  2. Loewe

    Loewe internet hero Full Member

    5,479
    12
    Jul 15, 2008
    I have Gans, Leonard, Armstrong, Duran and Whitaker in my Tier 1. Never can decide who should be on top, the only one who I can´t put at number one is Sweet Pea but I often put him above one or another of the rest so, he has to be up there.
     
  3. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    91
    Dec 26, 2007
    Well when looking at it from an accomplishments point of view Armstrong can't be anywhere near that high. If you're talking purely ability than a case can certainly be made, but the same case has to be made for Whitaker in that case. When taking everything into account, here's my list:

    1. Benny Leonard
    2. Joe Gans
    3. Roberto Duran
    4. Pernell Whitaker
    5. Ike Williams

    Carlos Ortiz would rank at #6. Whitaker above Williams based on consistency and dominance, though his wins resume pails in comparison admittedly and I have no problem with Williams ranking higher.
     
  4. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,676
    3,496
    Jul 10, 2005
    1 Joe Gans
    2 Ross
    3 Leonard
    4 Armstrong
    and 5 perhaps Duran or Williams.
     
  5. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    91
    Dec 26, 2007
    There's no way Ross can rate above Leonard. Unless you're basing it off his win over a shot Leonard at the very end of his career. Leonard's body of work at the weight far outdoes Ross's.
     
  6. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    104
    Jun 30, 2008
    Based on what they accomplished at the weight and overall ability

    #1. Benny Leonard
    #2. Roberto Duran
    #3. Joe Gans
    #4. Ike Williams
    #5. Pernell Whitaker

    Ortiz and probably Canzoneri come in next.
     
  7. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,628
    711
    May 22, 2007
    1. Roberto Duran
    2. Joe Gans
    3. Benny Leonard
    4. Ike Williams
    5. Pernell Whitaker
     
  8. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,676
    3,496
    Jul 10, 2005
    Leonard never fought the Canzi's, and the Armstrongs, Ok Ross never did defend the belt when he won it. But he beat other guys that held the title.
     
  9. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    91
    Dec 26, 2007
    :lol: In that case, Ross never fought the Lewis's, the Britton's, the Kilbane's, the Welsh's, the Tendler's, The Kansas's, the Bartfield's, The Dundee's, the Cline's, etc. Probably because the two fought in a different era for the most part chief. And FYI, Ross never fought Armstrong at LW.

    Leonard's body of work work and legacy at the weight far surpasses Ross's, though Ross has his own legacy in being the first simultaneous 3 weight champ(though not as impressively as Armstrong's feat).
     
  10. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    1. Roberto Duran
    2. Benny Leonard
    3. Joe Gans
    4. Pernell Whitaker
    5. Ike Williams

    If you make your decision based on ability and achievement (as opposed to solely on achievement), then Duran must be number 1 IMO.
     
  11. Quick Cash

    Quick Cash Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,715
    342
    Jul 12, 2007
    1. Roberto Duran
    2. Pernell Whitaker
    3. Ike Williams
    4. Henry Armstrong
    5. Joe Gans
     
  12. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    104
    Jun 30, 2008
    As big of an edge that Duran's overall ability is over Leonard, Leonard's edge in resume at the weight is probably even bigger. But I won't argue too much with Duran at #1, he was so dominant and at his best was the overall most impressive fighter I've ever seen. My all-time favorite.
     
  13. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    91
    Dec 26, 2007
    You have to take into account the different eras when taking into account ability and skill-set though. Leonard was just as big a phenom for his time as was Duran for his, in different ways.
     
  14. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    1 Benny Leonard
    2 Joe Gans
    3 Roberto Duran
    4 Pernell Whitaker
    5 Ike Williams

    Same as SP's list. Though on a p4p scale, I have it Duran, Leonard, Gans, Whitaker, Williams.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,517
    28,720
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'm not familiar with you ,but I would like to compliment you on your post,good choices.imo.You are a welcome addition to our merry throng.