Your top 5 best HW of all time

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Kingkazim, Sep 15, 2010.


  1. RockysSplitNose

    RockysSplitNose Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,271
    62
    Jul 15, 2007
    :D:D:D I knew it wouldn't be long - put yours up aswell Tommy - ps which bit were you laughing at I don't get it how could anyone not think Rocky was the best ever?? :tong
     
  2. RockysSplitNose

    RockysSplitNose Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,271
    62
    Jul 15, 2007
    Where are you Tommy?? Do any other Marciano-haters out there want a pop aswell?? :) :) hehehe
     
  3. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,491
    11,009
    Jul 28, 2009

    SNV is so large that H2H he destroys Dempsey and Marciano with absolutely no trouble.
     
  4. Nicky P

    Nicky P Jamiva Boxing Full Member

    1,432
    8
    Jul 21, 2010
    1) Ali
    2) Louis
    3) Frazier
    4) Foreman
    5) Jack Johnson
     
  5. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,251
    13,281
    Jan 4, 2008
    Yeah, the size difference is such that pure gravity defeats them. They would only helplessly orbit the great man; subject to his brutal but deadly accurate punches, like handicapped pinĂ£tas to an expert sniper.
     
  6. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    Stoppage wise is what the game is really is all about.
     
  7. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    134
    Feb 6, 2009
    Spastic list by a spastic poster. Head to head, apparently, but you have men above other men who have beaten them, and the 'resume' one. How in any way has Holyfield got a better record than Ali? Foreman has a very poor record in comparison to Lewis in my opinion. It's all in all a ****ing joke, much like it's poster.
     
  8. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,255
    Feb 6, 2009
    ali/lewis

    then holmes, foreman, liston, louis and tyson fighting for the other 3 places
     
  9. spud1

    spud1 HAWK TIME!!!! Full Member

    10,667
    3
    May 8, 2010
    Ali
    Louis
    Holmes
    Foreman
    Lewis
    Holyfield

    The first two are interchangeable but majority of the time i'll put Ali over louis.

    From Holmes to lewis again that is interchangeable buti tend to put foreman at number three in a majorityof cases.

    Holyfield had to be on the list despite the thread starter asking for 5, holyfield has beaten too many good opponents to be forgoten about.
     
  10. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,491
    11,009
    Jul 28, 2009

    So true. :yep
     
  11. Muchmoore

    Muchmoore Guest

    I can't rate Rocky in the top two for the simple reason he isn't quite as tested nor has the depth of wins of either Ali or Louis. But he's as good a pick for number three as anyone else honestly imo, I'm a bit surprised so many people don't have him in the top 5 at all.

    A lot gets made of Tyson and Liston cleaning out the division but Marciano did the same thing (against better top end quality) and had no real setbacks along the way.
     
  12. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,251
    13,281
    Jan 4, 2008
    If we only rate them on their prime level, then?

    Ali obviously still stays high, as does Louis, but Tyson will come a-knocking as well. And Holmes may fall a bit.
     
  13. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,251
    13,281
    Jan 4, 2008
    True. The Rock do get underrated by some.
     
  14. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,243
    8,809
    Jul 17, 2009
    I rate Rocky around tenth. No higher,but certainly no lower.
     
  15. Muchmoore

    Muchmoore Guest

    See, I just think that's crazy (no offense amigo :lol:)

    Who do you rank above him? Criteria? Neither Tyson nor Liston should be ranked above him imo (this is coming from one of the biggest Tyson and Liston fans on here), Marciano cleaned out a division just as they did, but beat better fighters. Walcott and Charles are better than anyone either of them ever beat (with the possible exception of Patterson for Liston, but his second best win isn't nearly as good). If you weigh h2h heavily it can be justified a bit more but I don't get how a guy WHO NEVER EVER LOST and beat two near peak top 20 all time heavyweights should get the shaft in fantasy head to head rankings.