Your Unshakeable Boxing Opinions

There should be no such thing as an unshakable opinion.

The highest standard of proof in science is "a theory".

That means, the idea that is the best fit for the available evidence.

When looking at boxing history especially, we are looking for the idea that is the best fit for the available evidence.

That is all that I will ever claim to offer anybody!

 

Never a dull moment with you around i will give you that LOL

Serious question - how could you possibly know "90% of you are sad ancient and nerds uglies, pathetic physique and complete losers in the real life"

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder you know

 

Good luck, well maybe you don' need it afer all you will be protected with the cop suzie lmao!!!

 

Don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way out!

 

I'm sure we will all be safe in here and survive. If only we could get bigger and better looking

 

just curiosity what is your zodiac sign Sweet?

 

Sweet? One can only hope that was auto correct lmao. I am the archer like Archie Moore and Homicide Hank.

 

Now he's coming at you with pick-up lines. What's up next?

 

I mustn't be one of the nerds uglies

 

Sagittarius? Oh it is why i don't hate you so much

 

Lucky me hahaha. Frankly tho i don't place much faith in such things.

Back on topic -

I believe Mike Tyson would beat any sub 200 pounder ever.

 

Great Opinion....

I think the one anomaly is the 197-198lb Louis who beat Baer and Schmeling

 

I do believe me it is relevant in the personality.
Tyson would kill any fighter under 200 pounds yes

 

I consider Louis a 200 + pound fighter and don't factor him into the comment.

 

TBH i haven't followed such things much.

Here's another -

Donald Curry fought at an ATG level pre Honeyghan.