You've got to say a win for The Furious One™ will be good for boxing

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Super Hans, Nov 25, 2015.


  1. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013
    The Hevyweight division has suffered since the retirement of Lennox Lewis. Since it's been ruled a robot from Ukraine with mundane personality, with a jab-jab-grab style.

    The Furious One™
    would make a much better ambassador for the sport, as he is a gent and a scholar of the highest order. If Too Fast™ can repeat his victory from the sauna it would not just be a win for him, but a win for boxing.

    Like The Hayemaker™ before him, he has the right idea to rid boxing of Mr. Roboto™ unfortunately a broken toe ruined Haye's chances of ending Vlad. Can Fury do boxing a favor?

    [yt]0bQS4RA-DJE[/yt]

    Check out Fury's bodyguards.
     
  2. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013
    By the silence I take it, it is agreed.
     
  3. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,164
    15,957
    Jul 25, 2014
    Fury has a bigger mouth than broner, if he loses this fight it would be more embarrassing than Broner/Maidana.
     
  4. Super Hans

    Super Hans The Super One™ banned

    48,579
    88
    Apr 18, 2013
    Wrong. Fury can back up his words to a greater degree than Broner and nor does he beat him women. Plus Broner was a big favourite against Maidana who had recently been sonned by Devon Alexander, Fury is a big underdog against Klitschko

    :hi::hi::hi::hi::hi:
     
  5. Chezzie

    Chezzie Member Full Member

    237
    3
    Oct 29, 2012
    Who cares if he can't back up his words. It is entertainment, and everyone wants to be entertained. If it wasn't for fury, no one would be talking about this fight buildup. Therefore, he is good for boxing.

    Wlad may be a role model for boxing professionalism but he a boring c*nt