Zbik vs Spada for wbc 160 title ????

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Vincent Gottschalk, Jun 19, 2009.


  1. Vincent Gottschalk

    Vincent Gottschalk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,020
    4
    Feb 16, 2005
    Why???? :huh I mean Pavlik just fought Rubio why are stripping him of the title:patsch
     
  2. *BOX_FAN*

    *BOX_FAN* Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,540
    0
    Jul 5, 2007
    It's for interim WBC title but still don't know why :think
     
  3. Odo

    Odo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,145
    167
    Jul 25, 2004
    I guess the winner of Zbik vs Spada is Pavlik's mandatory.
     
  4. RightCross

    RightCross Grandmaster of Boxing Full Member

    10,533
    3
    Aug 3, 2004
    wbc needs some sanctioning fees I guess.
     
  5. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    Pathetic, Pavlik just fought their pointless mandatory how can they justify an 'interim'? He should relinquish the straps and just defend The Ring title.
     
  6. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    I've just realised why they did this. They obviously budgeted for a sanctioning fee from the now defunct Pavlik v Mora fight so had to find another way to raise funds. They'll probably come up with something else now Pavlik has cancelled another fight.
     
  7. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    I think the WBC is trying to establish a 2nd tier title in Europe. The NABF title is The North American Boxing Federation title, and often part of the path to mandatory status. I think they are trying to make the interim title its european counterpart.