Hrgovic came back from a KD to win the fight by 3 points. Parker came back from 2 KDs and won by 3. 1 scorecard had him up by 4 and 1 had him up by 2 so I split the difference. He lost a scorecard by 4 in a fight he netted 4 points from KDs. You could probably massage a path to him winning but he deserved to lose. Zhang did not top 113 points on any of the 6 scorecards in those fights. These were not the only times he collapsed. In the Forrest fight Zhang scored three 10-8s in a row and was up 7 points with 6 rounds to go. It was a draw. Zhang would have won if not for a deduction but it was 10 rounds and he almost mercy ruled his opponent. If the fight was 12 rounds he would have probably lost outright. Again.
First, change ours, providing your scorecards for Hrgović and Parker fights, explaining why you gave specific rounds to a specific fighter.
Zhang has never lost a fight except the ones he lost...of the ones he won, he won them all. Undefeated in the fights he won.
He's literally a 50/50 fighter in any meaningful fight. If he gets the KO, he wins... If he doesn't, he gasses and almost CAN'T win on cards - Hrgovic was close because Hrgovic also has terrible stamina and Parker was close because of knockdowns... But he did lose. Zhang's fun, but he's limited - hardly surprising when he stepped up so damn late.
When I was watching the fight against hrgovic and the one against parker, each time all of us were convinced he had won the fight. Hrgovic didn't know where he was multiple times that fight and he was stunned into very low activity for long stretches. Clearly zhang gassed, but not enough not to win in my eyes back then. Parker was on the floor multiple time and fought with a very low output. Back then i didn't see enough rounds for him. The commentary had a different view which seemed suspect to me from the get go. Probably all subjective, but I have zhang winning both fights, too. Close calls both, though