Why can't David Haye get a rematch?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by TerryESB, Jul 19, 2011.

  1. lazarus20000

    lazarus20000 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,247
    Likes Received:
    4

    You seem hell bent on defending Wlad and just trash on Haye at any given moment. How many rights did Wlad throw and land? Im not asking for Wlad to bum rush Haye, just to fight a bit more aggressively and release that great right hand of his. He was too afraid to do it, as Haye was too afraid to take it to Wlad.
     
  2. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2009
    Messages:
    10,166
    Likes Received:
    1

    ..............Agreed
     
  3. Ai-edy2007

    Ai-edy2007 STOCKTON 209 MOTHER****ER Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2011
    Messages:
    7,542
    Likes Received:
    0
    because he's a bum without a title and soon without a job.
     
  4. MickeyBlueEyess

    MickeyBlueEyess Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    3,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    Your right, Haye should just allow a 245lb man to lean on him and sap his strength :thumbsup
     
  5. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    37,209
    Likes Received:
    6,764
    Sanders or Brewster didn't seem too concerend with getting knocked out or being leaned on.

    Haye & Booth's idiotic plan to counter Wlad from the outside was a complete disaster. It was a carbon copy of what Ibragimov tried.
     
  6. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,272
    Likes Received:
    1
    Haye lost and he was the one who does not want the rematch clause.
     
  7. MickeyBlueEyess

    MickeyBlueEyess Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    3,407
    Likes Received:
    0
    Come on, the way Wlad leans down on his opponents putting all his weight on their backs is illegal and shouldnt be allowed.

    Im not denying Haye should have been more aggressive but it was a much more competetive fight than the Ibragimov fight.
     
  8. lazarus20000

    lazarus20000 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,247
    Likes Received:
    4

    I think the hate for Haye is clouding peoples judgements. Wlad shouldnt be allowed to lean on opponents, but i think Haye made too much of it too.

    Saying that, the initial plan did work against Wlad as he was unable to settle throughout the fight, but Haye needed to step it up which he was unable to do. This was down to Haye's lack of skill and courage and Wlads excellent use of distance.
     
  9. Rudolph

    Rudolph Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    Messages:
    4,198
    Likes Received:
    2
    You mean like this?

    This content is protected


    And how about this, is this legal?

    This content is protected
     
  10. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    37,209
    Likes Received:
    6,764
    Lewis was leaning on Holyfield like if he was a pack mule. Same in the Tyson fight.

    When Lennox did it then it was "part of boxing". Wlad does it being taught the same thing by Steward and he should be DQd because "leaning is illegal".

    Talk about double standards.

    If Haye doesn't like being held by a 245 lbs man then he should have stayed at CW. He knew what he was in for, just like Tyson and Holyfield knew.
     
  11. lazarus20000

    lazarus20000 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,247
    Likes Received:
    4
    Both are doing wrong and if any boxer uses such tactics they should be penalised, whether your a Lewis or a K!
     
  12. Rudolph

    Rudolph Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    Messages:
    4,198
    Likes Received:
    2
    Oh, my, does it not remind us of a certain recent bout?
    Paint one of these guys white and you couldn't tell the difference

    This content is protected
     
  13. Rudolph

    Rudolph Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    Messages:
    4,198
    Likes Received:
    2
    Alright, so where's the outrage against Lewis on these issues? Namely from a certain Lazarus20000... let's see... Not one post about it. But as soon as Klitshko does it - here we go now!
     
  14. rorik_bender

    rorik_bender Bellhop. Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2007
    Messages:
    818
    Likes Received:
    0
    Because this time it is him who would have to secure venue, guarantee 15-20 mil to Wlad stuff like that.

    Once he does that fight will happen in an instant.
     
  15. lazarus20000

    lazarus20000 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008
    Messages:
    2,247
    Likes Received:
    4

    Erm maybe because Lewis is no longer fighting? I actually dislike when fighters use illegal tactics to gain an advantage. Oh and yes, Lewis was wrong to use them too as shown against Holy and Tyson (who i wanted to win btw). I think refs need to come down stronger on boxers when doing these things.