Who fights at more catchweights, Mayweather or Pacman?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by remi, Jul 22, 2011.

  1. fighter86

    fighter86 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2006
    Messages:
    7,062
    Likes Received:
    62

    650 k paid out !!!!
     
  2. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    41,814
    Likes Received:
    5
    so does make him professional enough? it's almost like paying someone to assure himself of a victory. the least floyd could do is try to sweat it out.
     
  3. bRoNeR**a**G

    bRoNeR**a**G Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2011
    Messages:
    2,755
    Likes Received:
    2
    The contract stated that if he can't make the weight than he is fined, he didn't make the weight and he was fined, so what?
     
  4. bRoNeR**a**G

    bRoNeR**a**G Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2011
    Messages:
    2,755
    Likes Received:
    2
    I don't understand how people are arguing this, they have both fought at catch weights, but Manny has done it more, who cares?
     
  5. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    41,814
    Likes Received:
    5
    a boxer could look for his welfare. he can refuse to fight if he feels that one fighter would be much bigger than him and his safety compromised. floyd has the obligation to make the weight first but he already saw the loophole of paying the fine much more easier than making the weight.
     
  6. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Messages:
    16,472
    Likes Received:
    1
    Floyd signed to fight at a catchweight, then got the contracts changed when he decided he was going to cheat Marquez at the scales, to avoid paying additional fines to the Nevada State Athletic Commission. What Floyd did was actually far worse than fighting at catchweight. He told a 135 pound Marquez that he'd meet him at 144 (3 pounds under 147), then at the last minute decided he'd fight the lightweight at 147. Truly a POS move. :-(

    Unlike Floyd, Pac will honor 144. :deal
     
  7. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Messages:
    45,885
    Likes Received:
    3

    Marquez had to sign off on it you do realize.

    And before you say Marquez if he doesn't sign it loses a payday.


    So does Floyd.
     
  8. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,285
    Likes Received:
    6
    Lemme guess.....:think


    Bob Arum cares:bart
     
  9. Blizz42

    Blizz42 Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    4,504
    Likes Received:
    0
    Floyd decided to cheat JMM:lol:, why?
     
  10. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,285
    Likes Received:
    6
    you dont know the answer, *****nut?
     
  11. Blizz42

    Blizz42 Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    4,504
    Likes Received:
    0
    ****in ******:lol:
     
  12. crimson

    crimson Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2009
    Messages:
    5,899
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can you not say that about Cotto, Margo and JMM? Or pretty much anyone that fought at catchweight?
     
  13. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,285
    Likes Received:
    6
    I get your point.

    Now, Answer your own question, dumbass:twisted:

    Why did Floyd cheat on the scales against JMM?
     
  14. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Messages:
    45,885
    Likes Received:
    3
    None of those fighters had to re sign contracts.
     
  15. crimson

    crimson Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2009
    Messages:
    5,899
    Likes Received:
    0
    But they had to sign a contract where the weight is an issue and in your view disadvantageous to them.