THE OFFICIAL fight night in pictures Marquez vs PAC III

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by timeout, Nov 15, 2011.

  1. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,718
    Likes Received:
    3,533
    U clearly didn't see clottey....


    Ahhh yeah ur a 29 post tool...
     
  2. Windigo

    Windigo Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,131
    Likes Received:
    3
    My logic is that both fighters are notorious bruisers. My logic is that if JMM was actually landing effective punches Pac's face should show it. My logic is that most of what people thought were clean effective punches by JMM were weak arm punches with no body behind them. Is my logic that flawed. We have two fighters notoriously prone to bruising. One looks beat to **** the other looks fine. Since they are equal in how easy they bruise the only conclusion can be that the bruised up one lost.
     
  3. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,718
    Likes Received:
    3,533
    thats too much logic for these JMM and ***** ***s.:patsch
    cotto won too u know:patsch

    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  4. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,718
    Likes Received:
    3,533
    :good

    This is thread they avoid bro
     
  5. ovechkin8crosby

    ovechkin8crosby Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2011
    Messages:
    807
    Likes Received:
    0
  6. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,718
    Likes Received:
    3,533
    Who nesh???!!!

    This is a ***** jmm free zone.
     
  7. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,718
    Likes Received:
    3,533
    Reminder of a whoooping marqueer took
     
  8. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,718
    Likes Received:
    3,533
    This content is protected
     
  9. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,718
    Likes Received:
    3,533
    Juan Manuel "Klingon" Marquez

    This content is protected


    "I win three times yes?!?"
     
  10. bobotnaman

    bobotnaman ★★★★☆ Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2011
    Messages:
    3,884
    Likes Received:
    1
    pictures from 1st page, i can say that Marquez can now take Pac's punches.
     
  11. Bee KeepZ

    Bee KeepZ Roid City Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    3,466
    Likes Received:
    1
    This picture right here is crazy. They should check Pacquiao's wraps for calcium sulfate.
     
  12. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2010
    Messages:
    12,229
    Likes Received:
    4
    Damn.. I thought this troll thread had been well and truly shut down. :think

    Trolls just keep on trollin'!

    I urge anyone who's interested to read the entire thread for some ownage. :deal
     
  13. hooligan

    hooligan Millionaire Bum Full Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    4,499
    Likes Received:
    10

    :lol:
     
  14. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,718
    Likes Received:
    3,533
    Pictures of fight night is trolling now?

    Just because they show ur man marqueer getting his melon head slapped up.:patsch
     
  15. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2010
    Messages:
    12,229
    Likes Received:
    4

    It is trolling. Because, as I explained to you several times, a few snapshots from a 12 round fight doesn't prove anything either way. Someone could have done a thread just showing Marquez landing shots. Would that prove that you that Marquez won it? No. But you were claiming this **** as proof.

    Pacquiao landed some lovely shots. I have no problem with the thread as long as you recognise that it doesn't prove who won or lost the fight. :conf