Is al haymon BAD for boxing..

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by daddyc28inch, May 1, 2012.

  1. daddyc28inch

    daddyc28inch Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,303
    Likes Received:
    0
    GBP is not that bad
     
  2. daddyc28inch

    daddyc28inch Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,303
    Likes Received:
    0
    canelo is the same age as broner and has fought much better talent fighters than broner..But we will see how good he really is may 5.

    i am hoping for the best sugar shane to come foward and trade with canelo..

    then maybe against james kirk. later this year.
     
  3. qwert

    qwert Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,544
    Likes Received:
    68
    Haymon is terrible for boxing, but great for his fighters. If Berto can earn over a million dollars fighting Hernandez, Gary Russell Jr can knock over nobodies in 8 rounders and Broner can continue to defend his "world title" against hand-picked opponents all on a premium subscription channel, that's HBO's fault. Haymon is just doing his job.
     
  4. pong

    pong Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    3,732
    Likes Received:
    1
    name one great fight he was involved in.great for his fighters not so great for fans
     
  5. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    28,160
    Likes Received:
    32
    i honestly can't fault haymon in whatever he's doing with his fighters. the better they do, the more money he makes.

    it should be clear to everybody that haymon is in this business to make money for himself.
     
  6. Undisputed P4P

    Undisputed P4P esb FBL & FIFA 12 champ Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    3,368
    Likes Received:
    1
    canelo has fought nobody who would bring him any big problems, he's been carefully matched and for me ponce de leon is better than any fighter canelo has got in the ring with.

    if shane comes in light and doesn't rehydrate big then he has a chance, he's going to need his speed. canelo's youth gives him a huge advantage, he should be able to dominate from round 3 onwards with shane's recent poor conditioning and ring rust.

    if he gets past shane then kirkland would be ok, but he should be fighting elite fighters, i go back to my earlier point that if you have a belt you should be fighting the best possible fighters. he should try to make fights with cotto and martinez.

    these fighters need to look at abner mares, he is one of the few true champions in boxing, he will fight anyone and tries to make the biggest fights.
     
  7. daddyc28inch

    daddyc28inch Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,303
    Likes Received:
    0
    to bad now days money is way more important than fighting the best for legacy..
     
  8. PrinceN

    PrinceN Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Messages:
    17,987
    Likes Received:
    2
    PEOPLE still ducking the question what fighter from the UK should Broner fight in his weight calss that would take undercard money?
     
  9. BOXING DON

    BOXING DON Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2010
    Messages:
    892
    Likes Received:
    1
    This is just ONE thing that's fked up about boxing, all these so-called champs that don't wanna' fight anybody. In the real eras, if you were 'champ', you had to prove it. I DO get tired of those grinning chimps that Haymon has at EVERY fight, yelling, and grinning like they're in a damn circus. When their guy loses, you don't see those stooges.
     
  10. Beezy

    Beezy 2 Eazzy Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2010
    Messages:
    4,486
    Likes Received:
    1
    I have no problem with who Broner is fighting.. I just have a problem with him having a BELT
     
  11. daprofessor

    daprofessor da legendary professor Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Messages:
    12,240
    Likes Received:
    15
    haymon is good for boxing. if not for haymon....many of the african american fighters today would be avoided like the plague. arum for the most part, puts african american fighters on the back burner. as for the "inflated purses" of his fighter....i'd rather the fighters get the money than the greedy promoters.
     
  12. king khan

    king khan Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    Messages:
    10,733
    Likes Received:
    0
    He's bad for boxing, but good for boxers.
     
  13. DemolitionDan

    DemolitionDan ATG and HoF Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    17,643
    Likes Received:
    10
    Of course he is.
     
  14. PrinceN

    PrinceN Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Messages:
    17,987
    Likes Received:
    2
    who should have the belt :rofl:rofl You got a problem with the asians having the other belts?
     
  15. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2008
    Messages:
    19,105
    Likes Received:
    42
    Well, I'm a Berto fan, (another Haymon fighter), and he's certainly taken his share of criticism over the years for the void in appealing opposition on his resume. That said, there are similarities in Broner's career path thus far to Berto's earlier career pacing - and whatever detractions he's presently subjected to, IMO, are deserved; as were Berto's.