Wlds lbs are not better than anyone elses he just has more of them. A 6'6 250lb martinez would break wlad in half
On my personal list he has the number 3 spot. Ward beat besides froch only mediocre fighters. And froch is just a very tough guy with above average skills. Dawson was weight drained. Wlad beat imo better guys then ward. And he does it for a decade. I take haye, chagaev, Ibragimov, Byrd and peter above everyone on ward's resume skill level wise. 1. Floyd 2. Pac 3. Wlad 4. Donaire 5. Ward 6. Martinez 7. Moreno 8. Gamboa 9. Bradley 10. Vitali
LL was never as dominant and never held the tile for as long ect . Hope this helps . PS And LL had alot more talant in the lower weigt classes during his stint .
But he knocks more oponents out ? He gets hit less ? He has barly lost a round in 8 years due to his boxing skill ? So he is both a power puncher and a fantastic boxer ? So do these guys do better exactly ? Just sayn :yep
Exactly! Its a pound for pound list. Can everyone say definitively, that a Wlad at 6' 3", 210 lb would be as dominant? Would anyone HONESTLY say if he were that size, he would beat Haye again?
FAIL! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKZSaWyedFo&feature=autoplay&list=SPB93ADB6075AC7016&playnext=1
If Wlad was smaller then he would have developed a different boxing style. The argument is stupid. Haye has to use what skills he has (being the faster and more agile guy) and Wlad has to use his size and reach. It is no good asking 'if everyone was the same size' because fighters would fight differently depending on their physical assets.
Look what he had to beat in his last 5 fights :think An overweight American Cruiserweight. A recycled Nigerian who he, his brother and that overweight CW already beat. A British CW turned used car salesman. A 40 year old French CW who had no business being HW. A 40 year old recycled American HW who he already KO'd previously. Does this look like a list a P4P#1 would have... :blood