Am I the only one here who agrees with 117-111?

:deal

 

It was closer to the right score than the judge who had Paulie winning.

 

Malignaggi was hitting gloves/arms all night. He was well beaten. But Broner should have pushed for the stoppage.

 

Paulie took 3 of the first 4 on my card too then he got a beating. Broner did not carry his power 2 weight class and Paulie always shown a good chin. Paulie still got a beating.

 

117-111 is perfectly fine.

116-112 is probably fairer.

 

Seriously Paulie won 4 rounds at best in my card. He was basically only hitting his jab every now and then. Broner had the cleaner most effective shots throughout the entire fight.

 

Not a broner or a PM fan,but at end of fight,I would have rather been Broner ,looked like Paulie had been in a fight.:hey

 

Just rewatched the fight, and honestly, after watching it and analyzing it a second time anyone who had this closer then 7-5 Broner at the end is a complete tool who is blinded by their hatred of Broner. I think to find 5 rounds to give to Paulie you really have to look hard. Even a second time, to me this looks like a textbook 117-111 or 116-112 fight. Paulie won 1, 2 and 4, I can see an argument for Paulie taking the 10th, and if you're being REALLY REALLY generous I can see an argument for Paulie taking the 12th, but if you actually look closely at what landed, what didn't and how hard the shots were Broner was dominant in this fight. Paulie couldn't touch him. It was something of a fantastic defensive performance really. Does he need to be more active? Yeah, but at least admit that the mans defense was elite last night. It was very, very impressive how many Malignaggi shots he absorbed into his defense.

 

Come on 117-111 is like Froch Ward type fight. Paulie threw 800 punches and landed a good quarter with the first 2-3 rounds clearly his. He was always in it, that card was an insult.

Banks losing to Mitchell was more like 117-111 not the main event. 115-113 is OK.

 

The funny thing is that the only judge who had a perfect night is Tom Schreck(117-111).

This means that in each of the twelve rounds, at least one other judge scored like him.

Tom Miller did an awful job(4 rounds). He should be banned.

 

:deal Paulie didn't win a round after the 4th. If you're generous, it's 116-112 on your final. (Giving Paulie a later sympathy round) I don't give rounds for shoe shining when you're eating hard shots.... I had it 117-111 as well.

NO ****ING WAY DID PAULIE WIN 6-7 ROUNDS!! Anybody saying he was "robbed" should stick to watching the amateurs with computerized scoring. ****ing idiot punch statistic junkies.

 

The worst part of it is that even the compubox stats favor Broner pretty much overwhelmingly if you consider power shots to be worth more than jabs. He outlanded Paulie by 31 total punches. Even by the amateur scoring that completely takes the effectiveness of a punch out of the equation Broner STILL won this fight. When you add in the fact that Broner was hitting him with head snapping punches while Paulie was tapping Broner it makes the blowout even more obvious.

 

Tom Schreck's exact scorecard.

 

joke post

 

Paulie got his ass kicked in the 5th.......... wtf.