What was hattons best weight? 140 or 147?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Mr. STRUGG, Apr 7, 2015.

  1. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2014
    Messages:
    39,988
    Likes Received:
    17,071
    Whatever I say? I just laid out the facts for you :lol:. Casuals only obsess about pac and Floyd, and you clearly are one. Pac****s never like to debate in facts.
     
  2. Mr. STRUGG

    Mr. STRUGG Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    2,584
    Likes Received:
    0
    casual ? :lol::lol::lol:

    says the poster name ellerbe. :rofl
     
  3. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2014
    Messages:
    39,988
    Likes Received:
    17,071
    I don't only post about pac/floyd though. If anyone clicks on your thread history or post history, they'll easily see that you're a casual, and that you started watching boxing recently.
     
  4. Code Red

    Code Red Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2013
    Messages:
    8,972
    Likes Received:
    89
    Hatton was not fighting Floyd at his best weight of 130 so doesn't that make things even in that regard? Or is Floyd just better than Hatton?
     
  5. Staminakills

    Staminakills Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2012
    Messages:
    15,328
    Likes Received:
    2,095
    he best wins were at 140 but he couldn't make towards the end of his career. money talks and that's why he took pac at 140
     
  6. Pimp C

    Pimp C AHHH HA

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    Messages:
    124,356
    Likes Received:
    36,655
    Shhh! These haters won't let facts get in the way of a good troll thread. This is true, PBF wanted Hatton at 140 when both were at that weight after he beat Zoo but was turned down by Team Hatton saying he wasn't ready. Blame Hatton for the fight not happening at 140 back then.

    You can't expect PBF who just fought Oscar at 154 to go all the way back down to 140 to fight a challenger. Especially since Hatton never demanded that the fight to be at 140. Hatton said the weight wasn't an issue and he could spend more time training at 147 than cutting weight for 140. Hatton never made any excuses so why should haters?
     
  7. Mr. STRUGG

    Mr. STRUGG Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    2,584
    Likes Received:
    0
    it means hatton was a terrible welterweight. floyd fought him at his worst weight. that is undisputable.
     
  8. Pimp C

    Pimp C AHHH HA

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    Messages:
    124,356
    Likes Received:
    36,655
    Hatton turned down PBF back in 2005 at 140 that is undisputable troll.:hi::deal
     
  9. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2015
    Messages:
    78,122
    Likes Received:
    43,026
    it doesnt matter, Floyd still beat a better and undefeated hatton!:yep
     
  10. bacos_630

    bacos_630 New Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2014
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    180 - Fatton
     
  11. Mr. STRUGG

    Mr. STRUGG Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2015
    Messages:
    2,584
    Likes Received:
    0
    who was in his worst weight. after arguably losing to collazo. stuff of legends :lol::lol: