Lucas Brown just had a test is now clean

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Imperial1, May 31, 2016.

  1. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2013
    Messages:
    39,120
    Likes Received:
    1,802
    The fight was rightfully postponed but should now be back on.
     
  2. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2013
    Messages:
    15,621
    Likes Received:
    9,227
    I agree with this. Bottom line this is career high purses for both men, the fight has been brewing for two years and 0.07 nano grams of an over the counter medication that doesn't even need a prescription to be bought is not enough to cancel a major sporting event. I would feel the exact same way if Wilder tested for it and I'm not a fan of his. They postponed the tests are now clean if WBC wants to implement a fine that's ok I'm my book. But I believe with the evidence I've seen so far this fight should take place.
     
  3. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    34,250
    Likes Received:
    5,943
    This. :good
     
  4. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2015
    Messages:
    78,122
    Likes Received:
    43,026
    POOvetkins B sample was reported on Espn.com as a failed test. Where did you get that it was negative?
     
  5. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2013
    Messages:
    15,621
    Likes Received:
    9,227
    They were both positive. A and B sample is the same sample it's just the urine is divided into two different collections in case one is accidently tampered with or filed incorrectly. Both were positive but it's not like he relieved himself once comes back the next day and does so a second time. 99.9 percent of the time an A and B will match
     
  6. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    54,515
    Likes Received:
    121
    He's dirty the fight wasn't called off because he was I. The legal limit there were traces of it after it was banned.
     
  7. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2013
    Messages:
    31,283
    Likes Received:
    3,510
    Lmao...
     
  8. Lith

    Lith Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2010
    Messages:
    3,113
    Likes Received:
    1,263
    Bang on. Process was done correctly, but now it's clear that what Povetkin was saying the whole time adds up.

    Almost dodged that Wilder
     
  9. SimplyTheBest

    SimplyTheBest Heavyweight Destroyer Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2010
    Messages:
    10,415
    Likes Received:
    253
    Old limited Browne roided up to beat an even older Chagaev, laughable.
     
  10. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    18,544
    Likes Received:
    5,929
    Rigged. Browne was clean like, 4 days before the fight. Rigged ****.
     
  11. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Messages:
    19,033
    Likes Received:
    4,324

    Yea, there's not much to debate about Clen. Below is Browne's sentiment.

    http://www.*****.net/2016/05/25/new...wne-lawyer-leon-margules-plans-wba-court-case

    Now look at Alberto Contador's sentiment.

    They both sound the same. The result for Contador?


    Btw, the one issue with Povetkin is that they (WADA) don't have data on how long the drug stays in your system. That's the one debatable point for him.
     
  12. SimplyTheBest

    SimplyTheBest Heavyweight Destroyer Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2010
    Messages:
    10,415
    Likes Received:
    253
    Based on biased claims from Team Browne. Until independent bodies substatantiate such claims based on evidence, he's a cheat.
     
  13. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Messages:
    19,033
    Likes Received:
    4,324

    This. History has shown that the bad meat excuse does not work with Clenbuterol. Until he proves he was spiked/poisoned, he's got no case. Why is he suing the the WBA not the Russians?
     
  14. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    37,209
    Likes Received:
    6,764
    Exactly. There is no sound scientific proof to ban Povetkin at this point. He might be guilty, but we don't know that for sure at this point. In dubio pro res.
     
  15. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    54,515
    Likes Received:
    121
    I love how people are defending this nonsense oh he's clean now. That goes for anyone ever caught on something then