Why does size matter?

Yeah, I mean it seems every time you run into something you don't like you throw up a roadblock of one kind or another "we're done here" being the most blatant so far.

A fighter giving up 30% of his bodyweight is on the absolute extremes, the outer edges. Two fighhters of the same class fighters with 25-35% difference in bodyweight the number where the smaller fighter has won is exceptionally rare; that's what makes it extreme. I can think of only one example.

Your ten pound example equates to 6%. This is much more likely to occur.

Now, i've allowed for diminishing returns upon delivery in the HW class. Is there some other earth shattering fact that you'd like to share with us that would help tip the balance in your favour? Why not share it? You've grossly underestimated my intelligence, but perhaps everyone else's, also? Perhaps we could benefit from this insight?

 

Well, you haven't really "taken the bait" from the post you've quoted. In fact, you've addressed absolutely nothing in the post while demanding of me a second response to a post i've already addressed.

Generally, i'd regard that as very impolite posting, not to mention something of a duck, but as you seem to need to hear it again:

No, i don't deny it. Didn't deny it in fact, in an earlier post addressing the issue.

 

I've already agreed with that three times now.

 

It's a hypothetical question designed to elicit a response which might shed light on the topic at hand. You said immediately that you didn't want to answer it, after which I asked a different hypothetical question more in keeping with your demands that strict adherence to reality be maintained at all times:

Which you also completely ignored.

I think, over the course of five inexplicable posts, you have made your position absolutely clear on this matter.

Could we possibly move on to one of the other points I have raised that you have ignored, or even better get to the "we're done" that you promised me?

 

This isn't really true, is it? You've speculated upon having "vastly underestimated" my "intelligence", offered your opinion that i might be "a very sad individual", you used some unpleasant language that the swear filter had to deal with and called me "irrational" and "annoying".

This is certainly "name calling", probably the cursing passes for "trash talking" and probably calling me "sad" is an accusation upon my character.

None of this hurt my feelings in any way you understand, certainly no harm no foul, but i'd be careful about the "not me" attitude if you post that way.

 

This is nonsense. I addressed your point at the second time of asking:

http://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/why-does-size-matter.572366/page-46#post-18209797

You continued to ask and re-ask it while ignoring everything else I wrote.

http://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/why-does-size-matter.572366/page-46#post-18209811

http://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/why-does-size-matter.572366/page-47#post-18209850

http://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/why-does-size-matter.572366/page-47#post-18209860

http://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/why-does-size-matter.572366/page-47#post-18209866

That's four times after I answered you.

 

If that is what qualifies as "demeaning" then you started it pages and pages ago, long before i even posted here.

But my point isn't that I'm whiter than white, but rather that you are not.

There is nothing for me to get over. As I said to you:

Please try to read and respond to what I actually write, rather than just your own feelings about it.