ESB's bigoted writters have been spewing non-stop for the past 6 months the same idiotic comments of Brook "holding too much" against Porter, and how Brook was fortunate to win a close decision. The fact is Brook beat Porter more clearly and decisively than Thurman ever did; he shook and pushed Golovkin much harder than Lemieux could. He's called the special one for a reason, and i believe he's going to shock a lot of boxing fans tonight.
I do have to say that Brook beat Porter more convincingly than Thurman did..................Porter is the boxer that holds a lot, he also head butts, wrestles, I don't like his style............
Somehow Ward is a puglisitic genius and that's all part of the Boxing game when he clinches like a mother****er against fighters where there's no need for it, but when Brook does it in an attempt to tame a raging mad dog like Porter, they have an issue with holding and clinching. The hypocrisy is neverending.
Sky Sports had Porter beating Brook. So did I. The fact is Brook did not look impressive in his first step up against Porter, or his second step up against GGG. Maybe he spent too many years fighting all that low level comp. It is what it is. He's still a top 5 welter. He's just not special.
Even though you probably don't care, I had it 118-110 granted I'm a Brook fanboy, but IB had it 118-110 as well, and he's not nearly as high on Brook as I am. The match wasn't even close to being close, it was very easy to score.
The same british medias who had Bradley winning and drawing with Pac, out of 125 experts, lol. Having these hacks as proofs only weakens your assertions, clown. You can deny it until you turn blue in the face, but Brook won much more decisively and comfortably vs Porter than Thurman did.
ONce the bell rings its not going to matter what Brook did against whomever, what his resume looks like or what all the critics wanna babble on about. All will be answered in the ring.
Not to mention Floyd run like hell or hold on like a limpet while looking at hei paid ref of the day...but Brook holds ha ha ha pathetic...the fans must be worried that the next little boy money earner is going to get spanked !
This is why its such an intriguing match up, both brook and Spence have very good attributes good cases can be made why either fighter can be favord in the fight. The only way you can be certain one guy is going to dominate the other is if your a fanboy. far too many unanswered questions from both men makes this a 50/50 fight
Have you ever actually read any of IB's descriptions of a round in his RBR's? I'll bet I'm one of the very few who have actually rewatched fights and compared them to his descriptions. Let's put it this way, do you remember the scene in The Shining where Shelly Duvall finally reads Jack's novel? IB is Jack.
Porter-Thurman was a near draw. And believe me, that's no credit to Thurman. Porter-Brook was a whitewash. Porter dominated Brook and made him look mediocre. And Porter himself is near gatekeeper. I was only able to give Brook a few of the middle rounds. And I was trying to be as kind to Kell as I could. He's such a sympathetic figure, with his lisp, his crazy accent and all that talking about brownies.
How many accounts do you have? And why so many? You're CST80, ihavearm2, casual fan something or other, moparfan, and what else?