When was Hagler in his prime?, what fight.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Reinhardt, Aug 24, 2018.

  1. Mark Adam

    Mark Adam Active Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2018
    Messages:
    837
    Likes Received:
    254
    Ali`s prime was his fight with Williams though, I think he was on point because Cleveland was a big guy and a puncher.
     
  2. Mark Adam

    Mark Adam Active Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2018
    Messages:
    837
    Likes Received:
    254
    Thanks I`m going to post a question Titled what would have happened if there had been no Hagler?
     
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    55,387
    Likes Received:
    50,022
    Griffith very likely Napoles no.
     
  4. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Messages:
    12,137
    Likes Received:
    5,764
    very hard to say. I agree with some. Sibson physically, but maybe Hearns psychologically. If you average that out you get 1984... Although he looked good against that other Kronk fighters in 1982 whose name I forgot. Fought him in Atlantic City. Knocked him out in 2 rounds. I hate when my memory fails.
     
  5. juppity

    juppity Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2016
    Messages:
    4,342
    Likes Received:
    4,354
    Hagler finest performance was the surgical destruction of Mustafa Hamsho first fight 81. Hamsho had bashed and bludgeon his way to No 1 contender. And Hagler clinically dismantled him.
     
  6. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2006
    Messages:
    25,495
    Likes Received:
    2,179
    I am with those who suggest that the Hagler that became World Champ had already peaked. The Hagler from WormIII to Seales was Marvin's prime.

    But that is not to say Hagler 80-83 was anything other than simply... Marvelous!
     
    Man_Machine likes this.
  7. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2015
    Messages:
    6,764
    Likes Received:
    10,145
    In my opinion this is completely wrong in two ways. #1 Both Napoles and Griffith were small welters fighting at middle weight against a dominate and big middleweight champ, Leonard was able to go up to Lt.Heavy successfully, he had the frame to fight competitively at middle. #2 Both Napoles and Griffith were pretty long in the tooth,and beyond prime , and had many tough fights by the time they faced Monzon, Leonard was only taking care of his body and resting for nearly 5 yrs prior to him challenging Hagler, he was far more fresher than Griffith or Napoles. I don't understand were you see Napoles foot work was better against Monzon because for most of their fight he was the one applying the pressure and coming forward, than the fight shifted to the middle of the ring, and Napoles used mainly his abilty to ride, and slip punches, he had basically fought pretty flat footed until he was stopped. And neither man had the foot speed of Leonard even in their primes. I know most on this site have this super high opinion on Monzon but please be real about his competition at least.
     
  8. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2016
    Messages:
    14,589
    Likes Received:
    20,136

    Could be, he was devestating
     
  9. slender4

    slender4 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    8,959
    Likes Received:
    2,032
    Minter.
     
  10. Rope-a-Dope

    Rope-a-Dope Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2015
    Messages:
    10,137
    Likes Received:
    7,985
    That would be Caveman Lee. Actually it was the first round. Lee had a major drug problem at the time though. Hagler would have beaten him regardless, but probably wouldn't have obliterated him as quickly if Lee had been clean.