Tony Galento v. Adam Kownacki?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mrkoolkevin, Oct 21, 2018.


  1. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,568
    Jan 30, 2014
    12 rounds. How does this one go?
     
  2. Pat M

    Pat M Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,688
    4,193
    Jun 20, 2017
    I'd take Kownacki to easily beat Galento. I'm sure I'll have to read about how strong, tough, hard hitting, etc. Galento was, and how he had an abundance of things (intangibles) that don't show up on video... But I've seen Kownacki defeat an opponent that I know is a good fighter. Kownacki beat Danny Kelly, losing only one round on one judge's card. I had seen Kelly fight a war at the regional Golden Gloves a few years prior and Kelly is a much bigger, stronger, and better fighter than Galento.

    Kownacki also beat a 6-6, 245 pound southpaw recently, the kind of guy who in Galento's time wouldn't have been able to get fights. Kownacki. Easily.
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  3. Jackomano

    Jackomano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,242
    6,957
    Nov 22, 2014
    Kownacki is way too green to be in the discussion with a seasoned vet like Galento. Kownacki's footwork and timing are even worse than Parker's. Galento would be slipping Knowcki's lazy shots and would knock the kid out.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef and Smokin Bert like this.
  4. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,568
    Jan 30, 2014
    Have you seen Galento fight? His footwork and overall fighting form in general is much worse than Kownacki's and (especially) Parker’s! No offense but it seems like you put way too much emphasis on number of pro fights as a barometer of skill and abilities.

    PS - Forgot all about our Parker v. Stribling argument! https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/young-stribling-vs-phil-scott.615070/page-2
     
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2018
    AwardedSteak863 and Pat M like this.
  5. Jackomano

    Jackomano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,242
    6,957
    Nov 22, 2014
    Of course I have. I've seen plenty of Galento's fights and not just the fights that are on youtube, but almost all of his fights from the early to mid 30's on 8mm and 35mm film. Galento knew how to get leverage on his punches, cut-off the ring, and had efficient footwork.

    In boxing efficiency and timing is king and Kownacki lacks both while Galento mastered both. The fact the Kownacki gasses very easily shows how wasteful his footwork is and his timing is awful. Also, Kownacki hasn't even beaten a ranked opponent yet, so he's completely unproven, so the idea of a hypothetical fight with Galento, who beat plenty of top opponents and was even ranked #1 is laughable. Kownacki's best wins are Szpilka and Martin, who were both coming of a one year layoff, which far from proving Kownacki can even hang with the best. Jennings would outbox Kownacki and Jennings wouldn't come close to being a ranked fighter in the 30's.

    I haven't forgot a thing. Stribling actually beat top 10 competition before and was proven at the top level while Parker was merely at the right place at the right time. Parker despite being a former world titlist doesn't have a single win over a top 10 fighter and both times he stepped up he couldn't cut the mustard. Parker has a good chin and fast hands, but his skill just isn't good enough at the top. Parker has shown in the Ruiz fight, Fury fight, and Joshua fight that his footwork is completely ineffective. Joshua noticed it and beat Parker easily on cruise control. Whyte was completely out of shape and had no problem timing Parker, who's sloppy footwork kept leaving him out of position. If Whyte showed up 10lbs lighter he would've easily stopped Parker and I don't need to mention what Widler or Ortiz would do to Parker.


    Also, I don't just judge a fighter on the number of fights, but also the quality of their competition. The only way a fighter can get experienced and master their skill-set is by fighting a lot, since training isn't the same as fighting and learning what works and doesn't work. Parker lack of ring experience clearly has caught up with him and Kownacki would get badly exposed if he stepped his competition up.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef and BitPlayerVesti like this.
  6. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,568
    Jan 30, 2014
    As you already know, I completely disagree with most of what you've written above. So I won't waste your time with a rebuttal. But which non-publicly available Galento fights have you seen on 8mm and 35mm? In which fights would you say he demonstrated exemplary footwork, punching technique, and cutting off the ring technique?
     
    Pat M likes this.
  7. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,568
    Jan 30, 2014
    Genuinely interested in which of Galento's non-publicly available fights are floating around on 8mm and 35mm. Have you seen many other non-publicly available fights from that era?
     
    mcvey likes this.
  8. SambaKing1993

    SambaKing1993 Don't do it Zachary! Full Member

    1,668
    2,121
    Sep 17, 2018
    Kownacki was the type of guy that Two Ton would bash around inbetween his plate of chips at his local pub.

    Different breed back then. Back breaking work down in the coal mines. Meat and potatoes with no GMOs, and less chemtrails in the Sky.

    Two ton by 3rd round KO having played with his food in the first two rounds.
     
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    399,473
    81,506
    Nov 30, 2006
    TNT would moida da bum.

    And I say that based on publicly available YT footage.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  10. GOAT Primo Carnera

    GOAT Primo Carnera Member of the PC Fan Club Full Member

    2,665
    2,683
    Jan 28, 2018
    And good ol' beer. Alot of it.

    This content is protected
     
    SambaKing1993 likes this.
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,512
    27,070
    Feb 15, 2006
    I get it that Galento was not the most aesthetically pleasing of heavyweights, and he was not truly among the best and brightest of his own era.

    Make no mistake however, he was dangerous.

    He was exactly the sort of man you did not want to match your up and coming contender against.

    When he was at the top of his game, it probably took another contender to beat him.
     
  12. Jackomano

    Jackomano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,242
    6,957
    Nov 22, 2014
    This.

    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  13. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,568
    Jan 30, 2014
    Pat M likes this.
  14. unitas

    unitas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,062
    768
    May 12, 2007
    galento was one of the dirtiest fighters ever. he´d get dq´ed for sure.
     
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,512
    27,070
    Feb 15, 2006
    But he wouldn't!

    Galento was a contender, who beat other contenders.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.