Who had more skills Holyfield or Holmes

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Eye of Timaeus, Nov 13, 2019.

  1. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    2,814
    Holyfield had more variety and well round skills imo. He was better at more ranges than Holmes was. I rate Holmes has having better ring IQ and obviously a better jab, but Holy was certainly more well rounded.
     
    Bokaj and BCS8 like this.
  2. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    60,890
    Likes Received:
    81,263
    Agree. Holyfield was more rounded; Holmes was smarter in using what he had and his party trick was that snapping jab that he really exploited to the max.
     
    KuRuPT and Bokaj like this.
  3. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2012
    Messages:
    60,890
    Likes Received:
    81,263
    It's a fair position to take. Holyfield could do a bit of everything.
     
    roughdiamond likes this.
  4. GALVATRON

    GALVATRON Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2016
    Messages:
    7,694
    Likes Received:
    4,245
    That's ONE skill he did better but what about the other ones like left hooks, right hands ,body punching and ability to stay at range and counter, combo punching ? Theres NO way Holmes has Holyfields skills ,he could dictate fights better through a long jab and was smarter but if were talking more skilled ? Its Holyfield and anyone should see that.
     
    BCS8 and KuRuPT like this.
  5. manilavanilla

    manilavanilla New Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2019
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    100
    Holmes. One of the best jabs in his weight class, outstanding recuperative powers, decent power in his right hand, terrific longevity. Holyfield is an all time great, but I just consider Holmes a touch more well rounded.
    Now, when it comes to who I enjoy watching more, it's Holyfield all day.
     
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    52,937
    Likes Received:
    44,799
    Holmes jab would be the stand out single attribute but Holyfield was more rounded. He was at least good in just about every department.
     
    Bokaj likes this.
  7. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2011
    Messages:
    8,462
    Likes Received:
    2,814
    Agreed my friend. To me it's pretty clear that Holyfield was more well rounded, and thus had better overall skills. If the question was, who had one skill that was clearly better than the other, then maybe it would be Holmes and his jab. Then again, I could cite Holy going to the body, which he didn't vastly more, and better than Holmes. Holy for my money
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  8. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    25,460
    Likes Received:
    9,450
    Holyfield may have had more but Holmes had more better ones and would school Evander over the distance ... Larry did very well for most of their fight when he was 42 ..