Battle of the Boogeymans : Langford vs Ortiz

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by johny, Jul 28, 2020.

?

Langford vs Ortiz

  1. Langford Decision

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. Ortiz Decision

    12.5%
  3. Langford Knockout

    31.3%
  4. Ortiz Knockout

    56.3%
  1. Eye of Timaeus

    Eye of Timaeus Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2019
    Messages:
    1,893
    Likes Received:
    1,191
    None of those guys are heavyweights
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2006
    Messages:
    98,469
    Likes Received:
    30,290
    Wills was the number 1 heavyweight contender for about 7 years.
    Jeannette was 190/200lbs , McVey 205/208lbs.If they aren't heavyweights then we have only had about 10 heavyweight champions .
    No
    Corbett
    Fitzsimmons
    Hart
    Burns
    Johnson
    Dempsey
    Tunney
    Schmeling
    Sharkey
    Braddock
    Louis
    Charles
    Walcott
    Marciano
    Patterson
    Johannson
    Frazier
    Spinks L
    Spinks M

    ps You didnt answer my question.Never mind what great heavyweights did Ortiz beat,what very good ones did he beat? Which ones who were Ring ranked top5? Take your time,I'll be back tomorrow.
     
  3. The Senator

    The Senator Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2017
    Messages:
    571
    Likes Received:
    860
    6'2, 210 lbs Harry Wills wasn't a HW? News to me.
     
  4. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    29,461
    Likes Received:
    20,061
    Ortiz would've beaten him too.
     
    cross_trainer and mrkoolkevin like this.
  5. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    5,497
    Likes Received:
    3,735
    Are you seriously asking a question like that in a history forum?
     
    lufcrazy likes this.
  6. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2019
    Messages:
    8,547
    Likes Received:
    9,593
    What? :D
     
  7. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2019
    Messages:
    8,547
    Likes Received:
    9,593
    Because he fought in modern era right? Because nobody with healthy eyes would tell you that Ortiz is sharper counterpuncher or that he has better technique. Langford looks amazing on film, Ortiz is a technically sound, but slow and limited counter puncher. The only thing he has on Langford is size and Sam dealt with that so many times that it's not a big factor.
     
    Dance84, George Crowcroft and mcvey like this.
  8. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    5,497
    Likes Received:
    3,735
    So Ortiz's enormous size advantage would not be a big factor in this fantasy match-up? Ortiz is 6'4", 240 lbs... how many times did Sam deal with this type of opponent?
     
    cross_trainer and Devon like this.
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    82,092
    Likes Received:
    22,234
    Wills, Jeannette and McVey
     
  10. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2019
    Messages:
    8,547
    Likes Received:
    9,593
    Langford beat:

    5'10.5 and 210-220 lbs Sam McVea
    6'2.5 and 220-240 lbs George Godfrey
    6'2 and 210-220 lbs Harry Wills
    6'1 and 210-230 lbs Bearcat Wright

    Not to mention tons of big men of lesser quality. Being 6'4 and 240 lbs alone wouldn't help Ortiz.
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    82,092
    Likes Received:
    22,234
    Well why would I have wishful thinking in such an obscure matchup?

    My fave heavyweight is Frank Bruno.
     
    Dance84 likes this.
  12. CharlesBurley

    CharlesBurley Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2020
    Messages:
    2,065
    Likes Received:
    1,886
    Ortiz would be too big, pick Langford apart from outside, push him back and put a beating on him. Langford is pretty much the size of Alvarez. Does anyone fancy Alvarez over Ortiz? If not, why not?

    Or people watch them, know they aren't using good techniques and pick the boxer with better technique who happens to be modern. Different techniques evolved over different decades.

    Then you have to factor in boxer participation. There's far more boxers in Ortiz's day than when Langford started boxing. When Langford started boxing the sport was illegal in many states. Ortiz mastered his art for years in the amateur program before even turning professional.

    Also boxing with 4 ounce gloves in the 1910s is almost a different sport to boxing with 10 ounce gloves because of the gloves and rules.
     
    cross_trainer and TipNom like this.
  13. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2019
    Messages:
    8,547
    Likes Received:
    9,593
    So Ortiz has better technique than Langford? Based on what?
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  14. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    82,092
    Likes Received:
    22,234
    Apparently you didn't read my full post because the next paragraph is what you've just written.
     
  15. Gudetama

    Gudetama Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2017
    Messages:
    1,040
    Likes Received:
    917
    Not sure I buy into this 'old vs modern' argument here. Although Luis Ortiz turned Pro much later (probably as he's Cuban), they were both born in 1886, so...