There's been a lot of posts for Big Frank lately so I'll print my contribution - Obviously his very best would be Oliver McCall in terms of status as it was for the WBC title. In runner's up spot I'd have Joe Bugner. Okay,I have n't forgotten that Bugner was ten years past his prime and at least thirty pounds over his best fighting weight but Joe was coming off wins against James Tillis,David Bey and Greg Page who were pretty useful contenders. It could be said that they were past their best but Joe was even more past his. In fact,Joe seemed to be in better form during those two years,1986-87,than he was two/three years earlier when he lost to Stefan Tangstead and squeaked by Anders Eklund. Both of whom were n't as good as Tillis,Bey and Page. What do you all think ?
Gerrie Coetzee was another. Past his best in '86 but I don't think that anyone else starched him inside one stanza like Bruno did.
I'll agree with that Stevie, he absolutely blasted Gerrie to the floor, like no one else. Tillis wasn't a bad win really. I know he was on the journey man road then, but he did take Tyson ten not long before, and Tillis had had enough by the time Frank's jab had smashed his face.
Bruno/Bugner was peak for me. Sure, Bugner had seen better days, but he was in a good run of form, which made him a legitimate top 10/15 fighter at the time, and plenty thought he would beat the Bomber. And yet Bruno came in confident, dominated from the start and stayed patient until his chance came. Beating Coetzer in the 90s was another solid win to compare with Coetzee, Bugner and McCall. Also, although not often talked about, stopping Tillis in five (Quick coming in having taken a young Tyson the distance) was also decent form.
His best wins were McCall, Coetzee, Bugner, Tillis, Coetzer, Brown, Cummings and Williams. Most of those guys were either past it or not very good but regardless, those are his top victories
Oliver McCall Pretty clear cut this is his best win Carl Williams Williams was significantly past prime but still dangerous Joe Bugner Joe was also past prime but had put together a nice winning streak in his 1985-87 comeback
I'm a bit surprised his resume is this poor. He wasn't going to beat the Tyson's and Lewis's, but I do think he could have beaten some pretty good fighters
Hard to forget his first round stoppage of Chuck Gardner in Cannes. Shown live on the BBC, when they used to show boxing.
I think McCall and Bugner were good performances. As @Saintpat said, his best performances were losses against Tyson in the first fight, and Lewis. His win against Tillis was expected and came as no surprise. His win against Coetzer wasn't bad, but Coetzer was there to be taken I think. Frank fought a particularly dirty fight though, rabbit punching and fouling constantly.
His whole career was a bit of a fraud. But he did stay in great shape and trained hard and was incredibly determined so with that protective matchmaking he maintained his 'prime' for almost a decade and eventually picked up a world title.
With hindsight I remember my dad trying to suppress a laugh as the twelve year old TBooze expressed concern that Bruno might be in trouble, as Gardner looked like (and I am not making this up) a white Hagler!
Ouch; that put down I think might hurt Frank more than any Tyson combo or Lewis bomb! His career was very well managed, they got every penny they could out of him, but it was on the level, I would not call it a fraud.