Michael Spinks vs Michael Dokes

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mr. magoo, Aug 19, 2023.

  1. GoldenHulk

    GoldenHulk Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,900
    Likes Received:
    5,626
    Overachiever vs an Underachiever, I take Spinks all day every day.
     
    Bonecrusher likes this.
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    55,095
    Likes Received:
    49,243
    Interesting take on Spinks being an overachiever. I always thought him hugely talented who achieved accordingly. At light heavyweight he had virtually everything you could want - durability, power, defense, size, great jab, the whole package really in a slightly awkward unorthodox framework which only made him harder to beat. Brilliant tactician too with Futch in his corner but the truth if he didn't overly rely on him either as he was absent for the Holmes fights. I guess we could say he upset the odds beating Holmes but a few things come together in that.
     
  3. MarkusFlorez99

    MarkusFlorez99 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2021
    Messages:
    17,161
    Likes Received:
    19,129
  4. Devon

    Devon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2018
    Messages:
    7,531
    Likes Received:
    6,849
    Spinks stops Dokes late as he tires.

    Dokes was all fast twitch, meaning he would slow down. He was explosive and was a good finisher, but I see Spinks being skilled enough to see out the early onslaught, and begin to land more on Dokes as the fight goes on and eventually become too much for Dokes.
     
    Last edited: Aug 5, 2026 at 5:49 AM
    NoNeck likes this.
  5. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    29,492
    Likes Received:
    20,077