Prime Tony Tucker vs Prime Chagaev: Proof that this is a weak era.

Apparently Tucker is highly underrated on this board, when it looks clear to me that he has the tools to give anyone trouble in any era.

 

Rico, please watch this so you can't spew some of your bull****...

 

Is this a joke? Tucker got knocked out by Ruiz and Herbie Hide. If he loses to guys like this, Chagaev will destroy him.

See. I can do the same thing too. Doesn't make a lot of sense, does it?

 

you beat me to it.

 

Yeah, except I know how to watch a tape and compare fighters because I've not a ****in idiot.

I set it up so it's idiot proof.

Know what I'm sayin...?

Ali lost to Holmes....I guess he was ****.

Yeah, go off the mother ****er when he was old as hell and in his decline and ignore the fact that Tyson was the first guy to defeat him and he went 12 rounds with a prime Lennox Lewis.

 

seems to me he has you rattled.

 

Tyson lost to McBride. Guess he was **** too.

We could do this all day and talk about fighter's losses when they were finished.

But uh.....I actually use my head and watch video's of the fighters when they were in their prime.

I think that's what reasonable people do.

**** Wlad lost to Sanders in his PRIME.

PRIME...

Keep that in mind.

 

Cuz it was dumb****.

That's like having a two year old talk back to me.

 

deep breaths....

seriously,calm down, your a decent poster but a tad melodramatic at times.

 

Tucker would of lost by UD, you taking the wrong fight with chagaev an wlad, of course wlad is going to make chagaev look bad,,,,no tucker loses, tyson was always in his chest, an i don't see why chagaev would not be,,,,UD, easy call

 

the pt the thread starter was making is that Chagaev isn't that good, which I totally agree with.

 

Tucker was a good heavyweight. He had his flaws sure, lack of head movement and sometimes a lack of fire in there, but he was a good solid pro.

Even with Tucker arguably never hitting what he could've achieved, mostly due to the financial and drug problems he had in the late eighties, I would pick him against Chagaev. And it's not that I think Chagaev is bad or anything.

 

I agree with that also. But Tucker was not that good either. It is basically a wash which he clearly does not believe. Tucker is not that much different than Chagaev and neither is the Heavyweight era in which the two fought in.

 

Oh yeah, my bad. Chagaev is just as good as Tyson even though he's never shown it in the ring, but yeah......you right..

 

I think Tucker was clearly better but to each thier own.