Pac v Cotto at 145. Who will give the winner full credit? Who won't?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by dhenzrae, Jul 20, 2009.

Page 2 of 4
  1. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2008
    Messages:
    7,721
    Likes Received:
    1



    no bro, cottos only saying 145 cause pacs insisting on a CW

    on cotto's term would be 147
     
    radab, Jul 20, 2009
    #16
  2. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,390
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ok . . . so I can pick two options. :D

    I just did.
     
    psychopath, Jul 20, 2009
    #17
  3. Guidokz

    Guidokz Classic Psycho Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    0
    :rofl
     
    Guidokz, Jul 20, 2009
    #18
  4. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    7,856
    Likes Received:
    0
    thanks for voting :good
     
    dhenzrae, Jul 20, 2009
    #19
  5. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2008
    Messages:
    14,285
    Likes Received:
    6

    -cherry-picked bigger guys than him. damn unbelievable.. and he's crazy.. Well maybe next time he'll cherry pick The Klits.
     
    igor_otsky, Jul 20, 2009
    #20
  6. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2008
    Messages:
    7,721
    Likes Received:
    1



    he said no :'(
     
    radab, Jul 20, 2009
    #21
  7. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    7,856
    Likes Received:
    0
    technically, it's still his term not pac's. but i understand what you're saying.

    this is a better illustration:

    pac's term - 143 (still 3 lbs above his division)

    cotto's term - 147 (his division)

    agreed weight - 145

    sounds fair to me.
     
    dhenzrae, Jul 20, 2009
    #22
  8. Guidokz

    Guidokz Classic Psycho Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    0
    because you're a ***** you *****..:lol:
     
    Guidokz, Jul 20, 2009
    #23
  9. tolindoy

    tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    6,396
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nope......JMM's already married to divac!!!:deal:hey
     
    tolindoy, Jul 20, 2009
    #24
  10. Ringnut

    Ringnut Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2009
    Messages:
    5,009
    Likes Received:
    2
    true, and JMM never struck me as the polygamous type.

    anyway... where's the hate? the poll seems strangely one sided.
     
    Ringnut, Jul 20, 2009
    #25
  11. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2008
    Messages:
    7,721
    Likes Received:
    1
    ^ you guys are gonna get me banned again ^
     
    radab, Jul 20, 2009
    #26
  12. GcIII

    GcIII Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2009
    Messages:
    932
    Likes Received:
    0

    :rofl

    WE DARE!
     
    GcIII, Jul 20, 2009
    #27
  13. Guidokz

    Guidokz Classic Psycho Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    0
    that's the idea..:yep

    just kidding radab, we need clowns like you here..:rofl
     
    Guidokz, Jul 20, 2009
    #28
  14. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2008
    Messages:
    7,721
    Likes Received:
    1


    :good

    go vote on my "who you want to see pac fight next thread" - i want to see the *******s take on this
     
    radab, Jul 20, 2009
    #29
  15. GcIII

    GcIII Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2009
    Messages:
    932
    Likes Received:
    0
    hmmm....i voted JMM, but honestly, i wanted Cotto:good Sure slambang!
     
    GcIII, Jul 20, 2009
    #30
Page 2 of 4