Nate Cambpell suffered a vitreous hemorrhage

Yes and No.

It depends how you see it.

All in all, it probably will be a TKO because there's no proof it was the head butt.

But Nate quiting wasn't taking the easy way out.

 

Yes you are right . . . it might still be a TKO but still a rematch should be in order to clear the air of the controversy.

 

Exactly.

 

Of course you do, are you ****in serious? atsch You think knowing where the sun sets is a legit comparison?

Here's a clue...doctors go through YEARS OF READING to know HOW to make those calls. You're a no education/no job/living w/ mommy and daddy punk....the **** do you know about anything?

ONLY a doctor who properly diagnosis the injury can give his "PROFESSIONAL OPINION" on the severity of the injury.

 

The doctor said there was blood behind his eye.

That only leads to one thing.

 

did you even watch the fight?

the doctor said nothing of blood being behind the eyes when he was looking at nate.

LMAO at eze not even being in college, jobless, and living with his mom. no wonder he's on this site 24/7

 

Go watch the telecast and get back to me.

 

No, because you're adding all this extra theatre. It's cheap to use health and bodily function like that.

Don't try to brow beat people into agreeing with you by playing the "blindness" card. That's just horrible, man.

 

the doctor says "it's not the cut"

nate says something like "doc, i can't see"

and then the doctor said "oh you can't see? we have to stop it."

tell me when the doctor said anything about blood being behind the eyes. maybe mommy was changing the channel of your house and you must've missed it.

 

Rough luck on Nate to catch a serious head butt. Ref was totally wrong to call a tko. Would it not be a good idea to use video replays in limited circumstances such as whether a headbutt causes a cut, or whether a foul contributed to a ko or knockdown?

 

Nate Cambell is 100% spot on, as he usually is when he doesn't involve race

if medical reports indicate that he had a vitreous hemorrhage, then its an open and shut case.

 

Campbell looked more worried about getting a loss than he did about his eye after fight.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRaYE8dUvPQ

go to 2:00. when did the doctor diagnose campbell with blood being behind the eyes?

according to reports, the doctor stopped the fight because he saw bleeding behind the eye. tell me where, because i can't see it.

 

Far more worried. :nod Most agreed, BB.

 

Look simpleton....it's not a forgone conclusion that the butt was responsible. If Campbell claims he cannot see...ONLY if the butt is the determining factor IS a NC warranted before 4 rounds are up. Quit being so ****in dense....atsch