IBF, WBA, WBC or WBO

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by truushot, Aug 27, 2009.

  1. truushot

    truushot Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,320
    Likes Received:
    1
    I didn't know that. Though I'd think that it was a money issue more then an injury issue.
     
  2. Maelstrom

    Maelstrom Guest

    There are only 3 major belts.

    The WBO ain't one of them:yep
     
  3. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2008
    Messages:
    18,334
    Likes Received:
    3
    It's really useless. They should just make one champion each weight class. Much like the UFC, nobody questions who is the best fighter in each weight class in the ufc cuz there's only one champion.:good
     
  4. truushot

    truushot Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,320
    Likes Received:
    1

    That sure is a difference but why not just have a dkb belt. (don king boxing) then it would be similar to how small the UFC really is. Boxing would be similar to a world wide mma organization, which doesn't exist.
     
  5. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    9,543
    Likes Received:
    4
    Getting a 12 inch dildo up the ass; getting cancer; having a stroke; or poking one of your eyes out and eating it?
     
  6. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    35,621
    Likes Received:
    12
    No on the contrary you'll find alot of old school guys dont. The WBO are the most farcical of all the belts because there champions historically have always been poor in comparison to the others. Even if someone notable does hold their belt its only for a short period of time and normally used as leverage for something else. Back in the 90's Warren jumped all over the WBO. Much like he did the WBU.:roll:
     
  7. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    35,621
    Likes Received:
    12
    It was the WBA.
     
  8. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    35,621
    Likes Received:
    12
    The IBO has a computerised ranking system that awards fighters points according to wins and losses. But there very much a fringe organisation. There champions also have been a joke and their belt frequently just happens to be vacant when a big fight is on the line.
     
  9. tolindoy

    tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    6,396
    Likes Received:
    0
    yep...it is now...
     
  10. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2009
    Messages:
    13,968
    Likes Received:
    70
    about the weight classes : sorry , but it is fine as it is.
    about the organizations - let us be the first who will refrain to call someone who has some belt a champion just because he has a belt.
    also , the organizations' problem met it partial solution already by the rise of things like PPV (and youtube,metacaffe,myspace,google videos,yahoo videos,etc to balance it) , TV-network contracts - like HBO , etc. so , if enough of the public/fans are smart enough and the fighters , promoters will stand their ground - like johnson and tarver both making a mockery of the sanctioning bodies and relinquishing their belts in order to fight each other for both money and the SMART recognition , and there are more examples like mccallum vs. toney1 , tarver/dawson1 , etc (i am sure that there are more).
    then the organizations will finally fall from financial reasons - of course others will come instead - or - a less corrupt management will take over - epocalyptic vision , really , i tend to believe it won't happen.
     
  11. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    20,449
    Likes Received:
    55
    It would be best if there was one champion per division, but that is not how it works.
    Every now and again I will go over who all the tittlests are and see who I thin i the best. Despite of it's flaws I find more often than not that The WBC belt holders are usuly best.
     
  12. FROST

    FROST Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2006
    Messages:
    4,529
    Likes Received:
    77
    The WBC has lost much of it's prestige the last couple of years, and they can only blame themselves for that. They're just greedy businessmen who don't care for the sport, with their interim champs, emeritus champs, and now 'diamond' champs... same with the WBA, with their 'super' champs and 'regular' champs, plus they let promoters like Don King or Sauerland influence their politics. The WBO doesn't have the same history as the WBC or the other, and they generally (not always) have weak mandatories and weaker rankings than the other organizations in a lot of weight classes, but at least they're more honest than the WBC or the WBA. I guess I rate them even above the WBC or the WBA at this point.

    That leaves the IBF, who are the most prestigeous even if they're far from perfect too.
     
  13. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2007
    Messages:
    26,390
    Likes Received:
    2
    I don't give credit to all these belts per se . . . I give credit to the man behind the belt.

    Like for example Mosley as WBA title holder and Cotto as WBO title holder at 147 . . . I respect. Devon Alexander as WBC, Juan Urango as IBF and Tim Bradley as WBO ttitle holder at 140 . . . yes. JMM as WBO title holder at 135 and Humberto Soto as WBC Title holder at 130 . . . yes.

    But Valuev, Sturm and Calderon as title holders . . . NO.
     
  14. Haye

    Haye Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Messages:
    4,928
    Likes Received:
    2
    They are all a disgrace. The WBA is perhaps the most disgraceful at the moment, and the WBC diamond belt I genuinely thought was an ironic **** take of the ABC's.

    They are all utterly disgraceful.
     
  15. Ripple633

    Ripple633 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    4,635
    Likes Received:
    1
    The IBF is the worst. After Dawson won the IBF title from Tarver, they forced Dawson to immediately fight Cloud or fight Tarver's rematch clause. The IBF basically controls a boxers career, they are so ****ed up and unfair, it's unbelievable. They stripped Dawson of the title just because he wouldn't agree to their rules, and now Tavoris Cloud and Clinton Woods are fighting for a belt that they don't deserve.