Mayweather-Mosley is a Non-Title Fight, Says Schaefer

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rapid, Apr 20, 2010.

  1. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2006
    Messages:
    38,291
    Likes Received:
    23
    PPv numbers is definetely the deciding factor, but bringing a title belt is far from being "****" especially when bringing it against another belt. Apart from team pac agreeing to a 50/50 split maybe they felt that perhaps Floyd is a tad bigger cash cow than Pac but bringing a title to the table evens it out for 50/50. While banking on just PPV's for mosely/mayweather anything between 800,000 - 1.2 million will just cause another stalemate and leave us back where we were in January.
     
  2. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2004
    Messages:
    31,154
    Likes Received:
    2,111
    He'd still have the leverage either way........"I beat the WBA champ and spat at the belt!"




    In Mayweather's case there are two reasons to not want that WBA belt......The sanctioning fees he would have to pay for owning it........and the other is that he would'nt have to worry about the WBA telling him who he has to fight.

    Good move in this case by Mayweather because he has nothing to gain by owning that belt........having it lessens his purse for this fight and future fights.

    When you're the best, and most people know it, you dont need a belt.
     
  3. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2007
    Messages:
    38,117
    Likes Received:
    5

    Believe me when I tell you that belt means nothing in terms of a Mayweather/Pacquiao fight. If the belt was so important, Floyd wouldn't be getting the much bigger cut against Mosley, and he wouldn't have been able to negotiate a rematch clause. Money decideds how negotiations go. Mayweather's earning power, as well as Pacquiao's, has zero to do with belts at this point in their careers.
     
  4. RJD

    RJD Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think he cares about belts at this stage of his career. He's already won so many. He needs no added leverage in the negotiations with Pac. He's the biggest draw in boxing.
     
  5. RJD

    RJD Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Got there before me.
     
  6. BrooklynMumin

    BrooklynMumin HOPKINS A " G " Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    6,797
    Likes Received:
    4
    The hell with the belts
     
  7. DoubleM

    DoubleM Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Messages:
    2,395
    Likes Received:
    372
    belts collect nothing but dusts.
     
  8. RJD

    RJD Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Messages:
    1,782
    Likes Received:
    0
    Do you honestly believe that Pac would concede lets say 5% because Floyd has the WBA belt? Cotto's WBO belt didn't help him much in the negotiations. Pac got the lionshare of the pot (as he should of) and he also got to fight at a catchweight of 145lbs. In this day and age PPV numbers will always be the underlying factor when it comes down to negotiating big fights.
     
  9. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2008
    Messages:
    44,341
    Likes Received:
    3
    This pains me, but, I actually like Mayweather for this. :yep
     
  10. crimson

    crimson Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2009
    Messages:
    5,899
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good for Mayweather. I would be an idiot to believe that this is some moral stand against the Alphabets, but this is the right move.

    This does not really affect the Pac negotiation. If he wins versus Mosley, nobody will care about the belt. Most casual viewers cannot even differentiate between these stupid belts.
     
  11. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2008
    Messages:
    34,796
    Likes Received:
    66
    Fighting for the titles makes the fight more marketable. In my mind. Why wouldn't he pay the sanctioning fees
     
  12. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    54,515
    Likes Received:
    121
    This fight is bigger than the belt !!
     
  13. Da Chin Chekka

    Da Chin Chekka Chi-Town!!! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2009
    Messages:
    3,376
    Likes Received:
    0
    :good:good:good
     
  14. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2004
    Messages:
    31,154
    Likes Received:
    2,111
    Would you pay over a 500K in sanction fees if you did'nt have too???
     
  15. Da Chin Chekka

    Da Chin Chekka Chi-Town!!! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2009
    Messages:
    3,376
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why should any boxer have to pay any fee to be the champ?:? Did the Yankees, Saints, or Lakers have to pay a fee to be recognized as World Champions?:verysad the WBA even created that
    This content is protected
    just to make more Champs and charge more fees. I wouldn't pay that **** either.:-(