If Floyd would have fought Hatton at his hometown and at 140lbs.....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Legend2, May 23, 2010.

Page 3 of 8
  1. oli

    oli Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2010
    Messages:
    8,804
    Likes Received:
    2
    Mayweather at 140 even quicker and sharper and hit harder and basically would have ripped Hatton up a lot worse than what he did at 147. At 140 it would have been a massacre and almost sickening to watch.

    Hatton fans who still talk up Rickys chances are the biggest cocksuckers in the world.
     
    oli, May 23, 2010
    #31
  2. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Messages:
    45,885
    Likes Received:
    3
    So him dehydrating further gave him more power than dehydrating less?

    And despite weighing the same against Mayweather as when he fights at 140?
     
    eze, May 23, 2010
    #32
  3. pretty boy

    pretty boy Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,621
    Likes Received:
    2
    Yes. Mayb quicker as at 140 floyd was a beast. More agressive with fast powerful combinations.
     
    pretty boy, May 23, 2010
    #33
  4. oli

    oli Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2010
    Messages:
    8,804
    Likes Received:
    2
    Well said! Boring as ****, the only exciting fights he had were the ones he got his ass whooped in. Left hand hug, left hand hug, left hand hug! Absolute shite.

    And the **** his fans talk is embaressing
     
    oli, May 23, 2010
    #34
  5. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Messages:
    45,885
    Likes Received:
    3

    Same goes for Mayweather's who punch output was greater at 140 than 147.
     
    eze, May 23, 2010
    #35
  6. Buzz Killington

    Buzz Killington Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2010
    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    0
    :good
     
    Buzz Killington, May 23, 2010
    #36
  7. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    16,487
    Likes Received:
    6
    Lol you think Hatton was much faster and stronger at 147 then he was at 140 ?
     
    JM22, May 23, 2010
    #37
  8. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Messages:
    45,885
    Likes Received:
    3
    I don't think he was slower.

    He didn't weigh the 160 against Mayweather that he was against Collazo.

    He was the same weight as if he was fighting at 140.

    I just don't see how him cutting more weight would make him faster, it would only hurt him.
     
    eze, May 23, 2010
    #38
  9. Buzz Killington

    Buzz Killington Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2010
    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    0
    I've already proven to *******s over and over again that Hatton was in better shape at 147 than at 140. These guys are immune to facts.
     
    Buzz Killington, May 23, 2010
    #39
  10. luilun

    luilun New Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2010
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hatton wins and here's why he's allowed to push and hold ,also smaller ring and no Xylocaine. In Vegas the ring was like 24x24 Cortez broke up all the inside fighting and Floyds hands would be hurting by round 6
     
    luilun, May 23, 2010
    #40
  11. eko718

    eko718 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2010
    Messages:
    2,804
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yes.
     
    eko718, May 23, 2010
    #41
  12. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Messages:
    45,885
    Likes Received:
    3

    Even with the inside fighting, Mayweather was doing better.


    Floyd wasn't using Xylocaine against Hatton. He would of tested positive for it.

    Mayweather would of thrown more punches getting Hatton even further at bay.

    Floyd beats Hatton faster.
     
    eze, May 23, 2010
    #42
  13. Buzz Killington

    Buzz Killington Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2010
    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hatton was in Floyd's face the entire night so the ring size point is moot. Floyd killed Hatton on the inside AND outside and Xylocaine is more ******* bull****. Floyd KOs Hatton at any weight.
     
    Buzz Killington, May 23, 2010
    #43
  14. JM22

    JM22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    16,487
    Likes Received:
    6
    eze just answer me this, what was Hattons best weight ? 140 or 147 ?
     
    JM22, May 23, 2010
    #44
  15. zfc

    zfc Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,367
    Likes Received:
    91
    Hatton fought Pac at Hattons strongest weight and look what happened to him!!!
     
    zfc, May 23, 2010
    #45
Page 3 of 8